A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-11/msg00547.html below:

Re: [PATCH v3] Allow applying filters to summary consecutively

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Richard Stallman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Allow applying filters to summary consecutively Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 23:04:02 -0500 
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > +  "Non-nil means that consecutive rmail-summary-by-* commands intersect.
  > +This way, the user can apply one filter after the other and keep
  > +narrowing the result."

The words "consecutive commands" mean that one immediately follows the
other, with no other commands in between.  Is that the way you've
implemented it?  I am not sure, but my guess is not.

Does it mean "using one summary filtering cpmmand when a filtered
summary already exists"?  That is the meaning I would expect in this
case.  But if so, "consecutive commands" is not the way to say it.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4