On Wednesday, November 09, 2022 22:04 GMT, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: > > Would there be any issues in adding the package? > > There is one issue, yes: is KiXtart Free Software? > According to Wikipedia, the license is "Closed source Careware". > And indeed, I can't find any source code on http://www.kixtart.org/. > If that's indeed proprietary code, then I think we probably wouldn't > want to host `kixtart-mode` on (Non)GNU ELPA. There is no dependency or inter-op with the interpreter, and the package was developed independently - since the source code is not available it is also impossible for me to create any link to it. But if this is the final decision I'll live with it. > Find below my sig a suggested patch to fix a few minor issues I found > along the way (the main one is arguably the way `kixtart-tempo-tags` > is passed to `tempo-define-template`). Thanks for taking a look. Are you happy if I take your patch, regardless of where the package ends up?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4