A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-11/msg00520.html below:

Re: feature/package-vc has been merged

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: feature/package-vc has been merged Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:33:37 -0500 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) 
> I have made :lisp-dir a general property of a package description.  This
> might be set in package-vc when generating the <PKG>-pkg.el, but in
> principle any (non-vc) package could make use of this to indicate a
> subdirectory where lisp files are stored.  For now this is something
> that will probably only interest package-vc.

Hmm... but if a package does that in an ELPA archive (i.e. the
`:lisp-dir` thingy appears in the `archive-contents`), then this package
will not be installed correctly when installed with an older
Emacs, right?

IOW, it's an extension of the ELPA protocol.

I do think it's getting time to update the protocol based on the
experience gained over the last 10 years, but I'm really not convinced
`:lisp-dir` is a good addition.

E.g. a thing I'd find more interesting would be to let the tarball provide
its own <PKG>-autoloads.el (which is in charge of adding whichever
lisp-dirs it wants).


        Stefan

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4