Showing content from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-11/msg00154.html below:
Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Gerd Möllmann Subject: Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 06:12:38 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Gerd, I'm there one who implemented shorthands in Emacs, and i sure
> don't think they are a substitute for CL packages.
Thanks for letting me know, Joao.
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, João Távora, 2022/11/02
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Gerd Möllmann <=
- A short defense of shorthands.el (but CL packages are still better) (Was: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages), João Távora, 2022/11/03
- Re: A short defense of shorthands.el (but CL packages are still better) (Was: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages), Richard Stallman, 2022/11/03
- Re: A short defense of shorthands.el (but CL packages are still better), João Távora, 2022/11/04
- Re: A short defense of shorthands.el (but CL packages are still better), Richard Stallman, 2022/11/07
- Re: A short defense of shorthands.el (but CL packages are still better), João Távora, 2022/11/07
- Re: A short defense of shorthands.el (but CL packages are still better), Richard Stallman, 2022/11/08
- Re: A short defense of shorthands.el (but CL packages are still better), João Távora, 2022/11/08
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Richard Stallman, 2022/11/04
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4