>> Let's see: when the definition is >> >> (defface display-time-date-and-time >> nil >> "Face for `display-time-format'." >> :group 'mode-line-faces >> :version "30.1") >> >> then the customization buffer is >> >> Hide display-time-date-and-time face: [sample] >> State : NO CUSTOMIZATION DATA; not intended to be customized. >> Face for âdisplay-time-formatâ. >> -- Empty face -- >> Show All Attributes >> >> But when the definition is >> >> (defface display-time-date-and-time >> '((t nil)) >> "Face for `display-time-format'." >> :group 'mode-line-faces >> :version "30.1") >> >> the customization buffer is >> >> Hide display-time-date-and-time face: [sample] >> State : STANDARD. >> Face for âdisplay-time-formatâ. >> -- Empty face -- >> Show All Attributes >> >> Looks nice. No strange error message about not intended to be customized. > > That's not what I asked. I asked about the face attributes. > > IOW, isn't > > (defface display-time-date-and-time > '((t nil)) > "Face for `display-time-format'." > :group 'mode-line-faces > :version "30.1") > > the same as > > (defface display-time-date-and-time > '((t (:inherit default))) > "Face for `display-time-format'." > :group 'mode-line-faces > :version "30.1") > > ? No, it's not the same. The latter uses a white background on the mode line.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4