Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s11948-013-9471-2 below:

Individual and Organizational Predictors of the Ethicality of Graduate Students’ Responses to Research Integrity Issues

• Al-Jalahma, M., & Fakhroo, E. (2004). Teaching medical ethics: Implementation and evaluation of a new course during residency in Bahrain. Education for Health, 17(1), 62–72.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, M. S. (2001). What would get you in trouble: Doctoral students’ conceptions of science and its norms. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity (pp. 19–25). Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bagdasarov, A., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., et al. (2012). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and Individual facts in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9414-3.

  Google Scholar 

• Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: An empirical Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 31, 1038–1057.

  Google Scholar 

• Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1994). The impact of dental ethics curriculum on moral Reasoning. Journal of Dental Education, 58, 684–692.

  Google Scholar 

• Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 362–368.

  Google Scholar 

• Brady, F. N., & Wheeler, G. E. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 927–940.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brown, S., & Kalichman, M. (1998). Effects of training in the responsible conduct of Research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 487–498.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clarkeburn, H., Downie, R. J., & Matthew, B. (2002). Impact of ethics programme in a Life Sciences curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1), 65–79.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Taylor and Francis.

  Google Scholar 

• Cojuharenco, I., Shteynberg, G., Gelfand, M., & Schminke, M. (2012). Self-construal and unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 447–461.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Crain, A. L., Martinson, B. C., & Thrush, C. R. (2012). Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9409-0.

  Google Scholar 

• Davis, S. (2003). The role of culture in research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 10, 189–201.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davis, M. S., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. R. (2007). Causal factors implicated in Research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 395–414.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical-decision making Literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fang, F. C., Bennett, J. W., & Casadevall, A. (2013). Males are overrepresented among life science researchers committing scientific misconduct. MBio,. doi:10.1128/mBio.00640-12.

  Google Scholar 

• Florack, A., & Hartmann, J. (2006). Regulatory focus and investment decisions in small groups. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 43, 626–632.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205–221.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Forsyth, D. R. (1985). Individual differences in integration during moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 264–272.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Geller, G., Boyce, A., Ford, D. E., & Sugarman, J. (2010). Beyond “Compliance”: The role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity. Academic Medicine, 85, 1296–1302.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gilligan, C. (1982).  In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development.  Cambridge, MA:  Harvard University Press.

• Handelsman, M. M., Gottlieb, M. D., & Knapp, S. (2005). Training ethical psychologists: An acculturation model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(1), 59–65.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Helton-Fauth, W., Gaddis, B., Scott, G., Mumford, M., Devenport, L., Connelly, S., et al. (2003). A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work. Accountability in Research, 10(4), 205–228.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henle, C. A., Giacolone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in Workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 219–230.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. (2002). Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct of research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Jeffers, B. R. (2005). Research environments that promote integrity. Nursing Research, 54, 63–70.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, T., & Gautschi, F, I. I. I. (1988). Will the ethics of business change? A survey of future Executives. J. Business Ethics, 7, 231–248.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kalichman, M. W., & Friedman, P. J. (1992). A pilot study of biomedical trainees’ perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine, 67(11), 769–775.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011). Ethical leader behavior and big five factors of personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 349–366.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Karim, N. S. A., Zamzuri, N. H. A., & Nor, Y. M. (2009). Exploring the relationship between internet ethics in university students and the big five model of personality. Computers & Education, 53(1), 86–93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lefkowitz, J. (2009). Individual and organizational antecedents of misconduct in organizations: What do we (believe that we) know, and on what bases do we (believe that we) know it? In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to corruption in organizations (pp. 60–91). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publ. Ltd.

  Google Scholar 

• Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Macrina, F. L., Funk, C. L., & Barrett, K. (2004). Effectiveness of responsible conduct of research instruction: Initial findings. Journal of Research Administration, 35(2), 6–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 175–194.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, L. A., & De Vries, R. (2006). Scientists’ perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 51–66.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737–738.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martinson, B. C., Thrush, C. R., & Crain, A. L. (2012). Development and validation of the survey of organizational research climate (SORC). Science and Engineering Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9410-7.

  Google Scholar 

• McMahon, J. A., & Harvey, R. J. (2006). An analysis of the factor structure of Jones’ moral intensity construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 381–404.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mirshekary, S., & Lawrence, A. D. K. (2009). Academic and business ethical misconduct A cross national comparison. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 141–157.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morris, S. A., & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 715–726.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, M. D., Antes, A. L., Beeler, C., & Caughton, J. J. (2009a). On the corruption of scientists: The influence of field, environment, and personality. In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to corruption in organizations (pp. 145–170). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publ. Ltd.

  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, A. L., Antes, A. L., et al. (2008). A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18(4), 315–339.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., Devenport, L. D., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., et al. (2009b). Field and experience influences on ethical decision making in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior, 19(4), 263–289.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., et al. (2006). Validation of ethical decision making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16(4), 319–345.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, M. D., & Helton, W. B. (2002). Organizational influences on scientific Integrity. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity (pp. 73–90). Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity.

  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, M. D., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., et al. (2007). Environmental influences on ethical decision making: Climate and environmental predictors of research integrity. Ethics and Behavior, 17(4), 337–366.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, M. D., Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., et al. (2009c). Exposure to unethical career events: Effects on decision making, climate and socialization. Ethics and Behavior, 19(5), 351–378.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2011). Thick as thieves: The effects of ethical orientation and psychological safety on unethical team behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 401–411.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

  Google Scholar 

• Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (p. 1994). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 223–243.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shepard, J. M., & Hartenian, L. S. (1990). Egoistic and ethical orientations of university students toward work-related decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 303–310.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sims, R. L. K., & Keon, T. L. (1999). Determinants of ethical decision-making: The relationship of the perceived organizational environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 393–404.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and Future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 53–74.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thrush, C. R., Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., & Wells, J. A. (2011). User’s Manual for the Survey of Organizational Research Climate, March, 2011.

• Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.

  Google Scholar 

• Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ulrich, C. M., Soeken, I. K. L., & Miller, N. (2003). Ethical conflict associated with managed care: View of nurse practitioners. Nursing Research, 52, 168–175.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wimbush, J. C., Shepard, J. M., & Markham, S. E. (1997). An empirical examination of the relationship between ethical climate and ethical behavior from multiple levels of analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1705–1716.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4