Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s10666-009-9204-8 below:

Mitigation Costs in a Globalized World: Climate Policy Analysis with REMIND-R

1. Alcamo, J., Leemans, R., & Kreileman, G. J. J. (1998). Global change scenarios of the 21st century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 model. London: Pergamon & Elsevier Science.

   Google Scholar 

2. Barker, T., Köhler, J., Anderson, D., & Pan, H. (2006). Combining energy technology dynamics and macroeconometrics: The E3MG model for climate stabilization scenarios. The Energy Journal, 113–133 (Special Issue 2006).

3. Bauer, N., Edenhofer, O., & Kypreos, S. (2008). Linking energy system and macroeconomic growth models. Journal of Computational Management Science, 5, 95–117.

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M., Massetti, E., & Tavoni, M. (2006). WITCH: A world induced technical change hybrid model. The Energy Journal, 13–38 (Special Issue 2006).

5. Crassous, R., Hourcade, J.-C., & Sassi, O. (2006). Endogenous structural change and climate targets. Modeling experiments with Imaclim-R. The Energy Journal, 259–276 (Special Issue 2006).

6. Edenhofer, O., Bauer, N., & Kriegler, E. (2005). The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: Insights from the model MIND. Ecological Economics, 54, 277–292.

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Edenhofer, O., Lessmann, K., Kemfert, C., Grubb, M., & Köhler, J. (2006). Induced technological change: Exploring its implications for the economics of athmospheric stabilization: Synthesis report from innovation modeling comparison project. The Energy Journal, 57–107 (Special Issue 2006).

8. Edmonds, J., Wise, M., Pitcher, H., Richels, R., Wigley, T., & MacCracken, C. (1997). An integrated assessment of climate change and the accelerated introduction of advanced energy technologies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 1, 311–339.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. den Elzen, M. G. J, & Lucas, P. L. (2005). The FAIR model: A tool to analyse environmental and costs implication of regimes of future commitments. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 10, 115–134.

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. den Elzen, M., Lucas, P.-A., & van Vuuren, D. (2005). Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes. Energy Policy, 33, 2138–2151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Frei, C. W., Haldi, P., & Sarlos, G. (2003). Dynamic formulation of a top-down and bottom-up merging energy policy model. Energy Policy, 31, 1017–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Gerlagh, R., & van der Zwaan, B. (2003). Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technological change. Resource and Energy Economics, 25, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Gerlagh, R., & van der Zwaan, B. (2004). Sensitivity analysis of timing and costs of greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Climatic Change, 65, 39–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Guest, R. S., & McDonald, I. M. (2007). Global GDP shares in the 21st century—An equilibrium approach. Economic Modelling, 24, 859–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Hamelinck, C. (2004). Outlook for advanced biofuels. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

16. Höhne, N., Galleguillos, C., Blok, K., Harnisch, J., & Phylipsen, D. (2003). Evolution of commitments under the UNFCCC: Involving newly industrial economies and developing countries. Research Report, UBA-FB 000412, Umweltbundesamt.

17. Hourcade, J.-C., Jaccard, M., Bataille, C., & Ghersi, F. (2006). Hybrid modeling: New answers to old challenges. The Energy Journal, 1–12 (Special Issue 2006).

18. Kahouli-Brahmi, S. (2008). Technological learning in energy-environment-economy modelling: A survey. Energy Policy, 36, 138–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Kainuma, M., Matsuoka, Y., & Morita, T. (2003). Climate policy assessment: Asia-Pacific integrated modeling. Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

20. Kouvaritakis, N., Soria, A., & Isoard, S. (2000). Endogenous learning in world post-Kyoto scenarios: Applications of the POLES model under adaptive expectations. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 14, 222–248.

    Google Scholar 

21. Kriegler, E., & Bruckner, T. (2004). Sensitivity of emissions corridors for the 21st century. Climatic Change, 66, 345–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

22. Kypreos, S., & Bahn, O. (2003). A MERGE model with endogenous technological progress. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 19, 333–358.

    Google Scholar 

23. Leimbach, M., & Toth, F. (2003). Economic development and emission control over the long term: The ICLIPS aggregated economic model. Climatic Change, 56, 139–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

24. Löschel, A. (2002). Technnological change in economic models of environmental policy: A survey. Ecological Economics, 43, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. McKibbin, W. J., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1999). The theoretical and empirical structure of the G-cubed model. Economic Modelling, 16, 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Manne, A. S., Mendelsohn, M., & Richels, R. (1995). MERGE—A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy, 23, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Manne, A. S., & Rutherford, T. (1994). International trade, capital flows and sectoral analysis: Formulation and solution of intertemporal equilibrium models. In W. W. Cooper, & A. B. Whinston (Eds.), New directions in computational economics (pp. 191–205). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

28. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

29. Messner, S., & Schrattenholzer, L. (2000). MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic model and solving it interactively. Energy, 25, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Nordhaus, W. D., & Yang, Z. (1996). A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. American Economic Review, 86, 741–765.

    Google Scholar 

31. Petschel-Held, G., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bruckner, T., Toth, F. L., & Hasselmann, K. (1999). The tolerable windows approach: Theoretical and methodological foundations. Climatic Change, 41, 303–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

32. Penn World Tables (2007). Version 6.2. http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/php-site/pwt-index.php.

33. Riahi, K., Grübler, A., & Nakicenovic, N. (2007). Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 887–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Rogner, H. H. (1997). An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 22, 217–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Rose, A., & Stevens, B. (1993). The efficiency and equity of marketable permits for CO₂ emissions. Resource and Energy Economics, 15, 117–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Sanstad, A. H., & Greening, L. A. (1998). Economic models for climate policy analysis: A critical discussion. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Takeshita, T., & Yamaij, K. (2008). Important roles of Fischer-Tropsch synfuels in the global energy future. Energy Policy, 36, 2773–2784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Vaillancourt, K., Loulou, R., & Kanudia, A. (2008). The role of abatement costs in GHG permit allocations: A global stabilization scenario analysis. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 13, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. World Bank (2005). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

40. Weyant, J. P. (2004). Introduction and overview. Energy Economics, 26, 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4