A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s004640000388 below:

Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly

Abstract

Background: A study was conducted to determine whether extremely elderly patients, age 80 years or older, were at higher risk for adverse outcomes from laparoscopic cholecystectomy than patients younger than 80 years. Methods: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 421 patients age 65 years or older from 1989 through 1999. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (age 65-79 years; n = 351) and group 2 (age, 80-95 years; n = 70). A prospective database was analyzed for mean ± standard deviation and using Student's t-test and chi-square analysis. Results: Advanced age (group 2) was associated with a higher mean American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class (2.7 vs 2.3; p < 0.001) and a greater incidence of common bile duct stones (43% vs 26%; p < 0.01), as compared with those of younger age (group 1). Mean operative times in group 2 were 106 ± 45 min as compared with 96 ± 38 min in group 1, a difference that is not significant. The extremely elderly (group 2) had a four-fold higher rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy (16% vs 4%) and a longer mean postoperative hospital stay (2.1 vs 1.4 days). Grades 1 and 2 complications also were more common in group 2: grade 1: group 1, 8.8% vs group 2, 17% and grade 2: group 1, 4.3% vs group 2, 7.1% (p < 0.05). One patient in group 1 had a myocardial infarction 13 days postoperatively, and two deaths occurred in the extremely elderly group within 30 days postoperatively. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly is associated with more complications and a higher rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy than in elderly individuals younger than 80 years. The greater chance of encountering a severely inflamed or scarred gallbladder and common bile duct stones as well as increasing comorbidities likely account for these differences in outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic

€34.99 /Month

Subscribe now Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. Author information Authors and Affiliations
  1. Department of Surgery, Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA, USA

    L.M. Brunt, M.A. Quasebarth, D.L. Dunnegan & N.J. Soper

Authors
  1. L.M. Brunt
  2. M.A. Quasebarth
  3. D.L. Dunnegan
  4. N.J. Soper
Additional information

apd: 2 May 2001

About this article Cite this article

Brunt, L., Quasebarth, M., Dunnegan, D. et al. Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15, 700–705 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000388

Download citation


RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4