A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s00464-014-3844-8 below:

Should prophylactic cholecystectomy be performed in patients with concomitant gallstones after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones?

Abstract Background

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the standard treatment for biliary duct stones. However, performing additional cholecystectomy after EST is controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of cholecystectomy after EST.

Methods

Between December 2008 and July 2011, we performed a prospective, randomized, single-center trial in 90 patients with proven gallstones who underwent EST and stone extraction. After the procedure, patients were randomly allocated to undergo cholecystectomy (n = 45) or to the group of GB left in situ (n = 45). The primary outcome was biliary complications at follow-up.

Results

Cholecystectomy was performed in 26 patients (60.5 %) in cholecystectomy group and in 13 patients (28.9 %) in intended conservative group. The median follow-up was 41 months. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that 8 patients (18.6 %) in the cholecystectomy group and 9 (20.0 %) in those who had their GB left in situ had recurrent biliary events (Kaplan–Meier curve, Breslow test, p = 0.555). In an as-treated analysis, 4 patients (10.3 %) who underwent cholecystectomy and 13 patients (26.5 %) who did not undergo cholecystectomy had additional biliary events during the follow-up period (Log-rank, p = 0.037). However, additional biliary events of cholangitis were similar in the two groups, except for a case of cholecystitis (Log-rank, p = 0.998).

Conclusions

Cholecystectomy after EST for biliary duct stones fails to reduce additional recurrent cholangitis but reduces additional cholecystitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic

€34.99 /Month

Subscribe now Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. References
  1. Ando T, Tsuyuguchi T, Okugawa T, Saito M, Ishihara T, Yamaguchi T, Saisho H (2003) Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. Gut 52:116–121

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2002) Risk factors predictive of late complications after EST for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2763–2767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Costamagna G, Tringali A, Shah SK, Mutignani M, Zuccala G, Perri V (2002) Long-term follow-up of patients after EST for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence. Endoscopy 34:273–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka M, Takahata S, Konomi H, Matsunaga H, Yokohata K, Takeda T, Utsunomiya N, Ikeda S (1998) Long-term consequence of EST for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 48:465–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prat F, Malak NA, Pelletier G, Buffet C, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Altman C, Liguory C, Etienne JP (1996) Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after EST for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology 110:894–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lau JY, Leow CK, Fung TM, Suen BY, Yu LM, Lai PB, Lam YH, Ng EK, Lau WY, Chung SS, Sung JJ (2006) Cholecystectomy or GB in situ after EST and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients. Gastroenterology 130:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Janssen IM, Bolwerk CJ, Timmer R, Boerma EJ, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ (2002) Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after EST for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:761–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lai KH, Lin LF, Lo GH, Cheng JS, Huang RL, Lin CK, Huang JS, Hsu PI, Peng NJ, Ger LP (1999) Does cholecystectomy after EST prevent the recurrence of biliary complications? Gastrointest Endosc 49:483–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tazuma S (2006) Gallstone disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20:1075–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hazzan D, Geron N, Golijanin D, Reissman P, Shiloni E (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians. Surg Endosc 17:773–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (2001) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15:700–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bingener-Casey J, Richards ML, Strodel WE, Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR (2002) Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review. J Gastrointest Surg 6:800–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsai TJ, Lai KH, Lin CK, Chan HH, Wang EM, Tsai WL, Cheng JS, Yu HC, Chen WC, Hsu PI (2012) The relationship between GB status and recurrent biliary complications in patients with choledocholithiasis following endoscopic treatment. J Chin Med Assoc 75:560–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohashi A, Tamada K, Wada S, Hatanaka H, Tomiyama T, Tano S, Nakazawa K, Sugano K (2009) Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: long-term follow-up study. Dig Endosc 21:73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carey MC (1993) Pathogenesis of gallstones. Am J Surg 165:410–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsai WL, Lai KH, Lin CK, Chan HH, Lo CC, Hsu PI, Chen WC, Cheng JS, Lo GH (2005) Composition of common bile duct stones in Chinese patients during and after EST. World J Gastroenterol 11:4246–4249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergman JJ, van der Mey S, Rauws EA, Tijssen JG, Gouma DJ, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K (1996) Long-term follow-up after EST for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age. Gastrointest Endosc 44:643–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Jun Heo, Min Kyu Jung, and Chang Min Cho have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information Author notes
  1. Min Kyu Jung

    Present address: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, South Korea

Authors and Affiliations
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea

    Jun Heo, Min Kyu Jung & Chang Min Cho

Authors
  1. Jun Heo
  2. Min Kyu Jung
  3. Chang Min Cho
Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Kyu Jung.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

About this article Cite this article

Heo, J., Jung, M.K. & Cho, C.M. Should prophylactic cholecystectomy be performed in patients with concomitant gallstones after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones?. Surg Endosc 29, 1574–1579 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3844-8

Download citation

Keywords

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4