A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s00464-010-1453-8 below:

The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database

  • Jorgensen T (1989) Gallstones in a Danish population: relation to weight, physical activity, smoking, coffee consumption, and diabetes mellitus. Gut 30:528–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NIH Consensus conference (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 269:1018–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon AJ, Fischbacher CM, Frame SH, MacLeod MC (2000) Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study. Lancet 356:1632–1637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A prospective analysis of 1,518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078, 1991

  • Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:158–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harboe KM, Anthonsen K, Bardram L (2009) Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database. Int J Qual Health Care 21:160–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mainz J (2003) Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 15:523–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Danish National Board of Health (2006) Referenceprogram for behandling af patienter med galdestenssygdomme (Guidelines for treatment of patients with gallstone disease). Retrieved 26 March at http://www.sst.dk/publ/PLAN/SfR/Galdesten/Galdestenssygdomme.pdf

  • Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T (2008) When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int J Public Health 53:165–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bardram L (2008) The annual report of The Danish Cholecystectomy Database 2008. Retrieved 26 March 2010 at http://www.kliniskedatabaser.dk/artikeldataVis.asp?id=27&m

  • Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A (1999) Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 229:449–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L (2005) Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:44–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G, Nilsson E (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234:741–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang B, Cuschieri A (2006) Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1081–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karayiannakis AJ, Polychronidis A, Perente S, Botaitis S, Simopoulos C (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 18:97–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman JM, Claridge JA, Haridas M, Martin MD, Yao DC, Grimes KL, Malangoni MA (2007) Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surgery 142:556–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J (2002) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 184:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veen EJ, Bik M, Janssen-Heijnen ML, De JM, Roukema AJ (2008) Outcome measurement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using a prospective complication registry: results of an audit. Int J Qual Health Care 20:144–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velanovich V, Morton JM, McDonald M, Orlando R III, Maupin G, Traverso LW (2006) Analysis of the SAGES outcomes initiative cholecystectomy registry. Surg Endosc 20:43–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D’Acapito F, Vellone M, Murazio M, Capelli G (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140:986–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Mattie AS, Lynch JT (1996) Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993: a statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry. Arch Surg 131:382–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell AM, Lincourt AE, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Cobb WS, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2005) Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93,578 patients. Surg Endosc 19:767–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballal M, David G, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Deakin M, Slavin JP (2009) Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surg Endosc 23:2338–2344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th ID, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203:723–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buanes T, Mjaland O, Waage A, Langeggen H, Holmboe J (1998) A population-based survey of biliary surgery in Norway: relationship between patient volume and quality of surgical treatment. Surg Endosc 12:852–855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando R III, Russell JC, Lynch J, Mattie A (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry. Arch Surg 128:494–498

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thesbjerg S, Harboe KM, Bardram L, Rosenberg J (2010) Sex differences in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24:3068–3072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kama NA, Doganay M, Dolapci M, Reis E, Atli M, Kologlu M (2001) Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Surg Endosc 15:965–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmeyer JD, Hamby LS, Birkmeyer CM, Decker MV, Karon NM, Dow RW (2001) Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? Arch Surg 136:405–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Froschl U, Sengstbratl M, Huber J, Fugger R (2006) Unplanned reoperations for infection complications: a survey for quality control. Surg Infect Larchmt 7:263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Branum GD, Hunter JG (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141:1207–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahatharadol V (2004) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 1,522 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 51:12–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 


  • RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

    Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

    HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4