Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OLC) may decrease the use of hospital resources and save costs. In the current study, the effect of implementing a clinical pathway has been assessed in terms of outcome for patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hospital costs, and available bed capacity.
MethodsClinical outcome and hospital stay were analyzed for consecutive patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy 1 year before (n = 338) and after (n = 336) implementation of a clinical pathway. Patients with acute cholecystitis or bile duct lithiasis were excluded from the study. A cost accounting model was developed using the concept of the bill of activities.
ResultsBefore implementation of the clinical pathway, 34 (94%) of 36 patients scheduled for OLC were discharged successfully on the day of surgery, as compared with 110 (94%) of 117 patients after pathway implementation. Among patients scheduled for OLC, the complication (0% vs 1.7%), unplanned admission (5.5% vs 6%), and readmission (0% vs 4.3%) rates were comparable before and after clinical pathway implementation. After pathway implementation, the increased number of OLCs resulted in a significant cost saving (40.5%) and benefit in bed capacity (1.41 beds per day per year) for the hospital.
ConclusionThe implementation of a clinical pathway preserves the clinical outcome for patients undergoing OLC. It creates a significant increase in the number of patients treated in an outpatient setting and confers a significant benefit in terms of hospital costs and available bed capacity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article Subscribe and saveSpringer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
Price includes VAT (Germany)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Fig. 1. Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. ReferencesBaschnagel B, Hansen M, Aaning HL (2000) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience of a non–overnight center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 10: 305–307
Calland JF (2000) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 233: 704–715
Collier PE (1997) Do clinical pathways for major vascular surgery improve outcomes and reduce costs? J Vasc Surg 26: 170–185
Fiorillo MA, Davidson PG, Fiorillo M, D’Anna Jr. JA, Sithian N, Silick RJ (1996) 149 ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 10: 52–56
Fleischer LA, Yee K, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Heath R, Bass E, Snyder DS, Parker SD (1999) Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost effective? A model to study transition of care. Anesthesia 90: 1746–1755
Jain PK, Hayden JD, Sedman PC, Royston CMS, O’Boyle CJ (2005) A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19: 1082–1085
Keulemans Y, Eshuis J, Dewit LT, Gouma DJ (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day care versus clinical observation. Ann Surg 228: 734–740
Maraïn PK, De Maria EJ (1997) Initial results of a prospective trial of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11: 1091–1094
McKernan BJ (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 57: 309–312
Mjaland O, Raeder J, Aarboe V, Trondsen E, Buanes T (1997) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84: 958–961
Reddick EJ, Olson DO (1990) Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 160: 485–487
Skattum J, Edwin B, Trondsen E, Mjaland O, Raeder J, Buanes T (2004) Outpatient laparoscopic surgery: feasibility and consequences for education and health care costs. Surg Endosc 18: 796–801
Soria V, Pellicer E, Flores B, Carrasco M, Candel MF, Aguayo JL (2005) Evaluation of the clinical pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 71: 40–45
Taylor E, Gaw F, Kennedy C (1996) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy feasibility. J Laparosc Endosc Surg 6: 73–77
Uchiyama K, Takifuji K, Tani M, Onishi H, Yamaue H (2002) Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1594–1597
Voyles CR, Berch BR (1997) Selection criteria for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory care setting. Surg Endosc 11: 1145–1146
Zegarra RF, Saba AK, Peschiera JL (1997) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safe and cost effective? Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 487–490
Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
B. Topal, G. Peeters, A. Verbert & F. Penninckx
Correspondence to B. Topal.
About this article Cite this articleTopal, B., Peeters, G., Verbert, A. et al. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: clinical pathway implementation is efficient and cost effective and increases hospital bed capacity. Surg Endosc 21, 1142–1146 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9083-x
Received: 12 March 2006
Revised: 12 March 2006
Accepted: 12 May 2006
Published: 20 January 2007
Issue Date: July 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9083-x
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4