A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s004420050462 below:

Modeled responses of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated atmospheric CO2: a comparison of simulations by the biogeochemistry models of the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP)

Abstract

Although there is a great deal of information concerning responses to increases in atmospheric CO2 at the tissue and plant levels, there are substantially fewer studies that have investigated ecosystem-level responses in the context of integrated carbon, water, and nutrient cycles. Because our understanding of ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 is incomplete, modeling is a tool that can be used to investigate the role of plant and soil interactions in the response of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated CO2. In this study, we analyze the responses of net primary production (NPP) to doubled CO2 from 355 to 710 ppmv among three biogeochemistry models in the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP): BIOME-BGC (BioGeochemical Cycles), Century, and the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM). For the conterminous United States, doubled atmospheric CO2 causes NPP to increase by 5% in Century, 8% in TEM, and 11% in BIOME-BGC. Multiple regression analyses between the NPP response to doubled CO2 and the mean annual temperature and annual precipitation of biomes or grid cells indicate that there are negative relationships between precipitation and the response of NPP to doubled CO2 for all three models. In contrast, there are different relationships between temperature and the response of NPP to doubled CO2 for the three models: there is a negative relationship in the responses of BIOME-BGC, no relationship in the responses of Century, and a positive relationship in the responses of TEM. In BIOME-BGC, the NPP response to doubled CO2 is controlled by the change in transpiration associated with reduced leaf conductance to water vapor. This change affects soil water, then leaf area development and, finally, NPP. In Century, the response of NPP to doubled CO2 is controlled by changes in decomposition rates associated with increased soil moisture that results from reduced evapotranspiration. This change affects nitrogen availability for plants, which influences NPP. In TEM, the NPP response to doubled CO2 is controlled by increased carboxylation which is modified by canopy conductance and the degree to which nitrogen constraints cause down-regulation of photosynthesis. The implementation of these different mechanisms has consequences for the spatial pattern of NPP responses, and represents, in part, conceptual uncertainty about controls over NPP responses. Progress in reducing these uncertainties requires research focused at the ecosystem level to understand how interactions between the carbon, nitrogen, and water cycles influence the response of NPP to elevated atmospheric CO2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic

€34.99 /Month

Subscribe now Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. Author information Authors and Affiliations
  1. The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Fax: +1-508-4571548; e-mail: yudepan@lupine.mbl.edu, , , , , , US

    Yude Pan, Jerry M. Melillo & David W. Kicklighter

  2. U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA, , , , , , US

    A. David McGuire

  3. Appalachian Environmental Laboratory, University of Maryland, Frostburg, MD 21532, USA, , , , , , US

    Louis F. Pitelka

  4. School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA, , , , , , US

    Kathy Hibbard & Steven W. Running

  5. Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, , , , , , US

    Lars L. Pierce

  6. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Ford Collins, CO 80523, USA, , , , , , US

    Dennis S. Ojima & William J. Parton

  7. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA, , , , , , US

    David S. Schimel

Authors
  1. Yude Pan
  2. Jerry M. Melillo
  3. A. David McGuire
  4. David W. Kicklighter
  5. Louis F. Pitelka
  6. Kathy Hibbard
  7. Lars L. Pierce
  8. Steven W. Running
  9. Dennis S. Ojima
  10. William J. Parton
  11. David S. Schimel
Consortia

Other VEMAP members

Additional information

Received: 13 December 1996 / Accepted: 20 November 1997

About this article Cite this article

Pan, Y., Melillo, J., McGuire, A. et al. Modeled responses of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated atmospheric CO2: a comparison of simulations by the biogeochemistry models of the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP). Oecologia 114, 389–404 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050462

Download citation


RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4