A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s00268-005-0459-1 below:

Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in the Diagnosis of Bile Duct Lithiasis

  • Baillie J. Complications of endoscopy. Endoscopy 1994;26:185–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lo SK, Chen J. The role of ERCP in choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 1996;21:120–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Assouline Y, Liguory C, Ink O, et al. Current results of endoscopic sphincterotomy for lithiasis of the common bile duct. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1993;17:251–258 (in French)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SA, Timothy IGS, Alvord LA, et al. Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography. Am J Surg 1998;176:632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 2003;289:1639–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vazakis A, Davides D, Ammori BJ, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1118–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montariol T, Msika S, Charlier A, et al. Diagnosis of asymptomatic common bile duct stones: preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography—multicenter, prospective controlled study: French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 1988;124:6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Kim MJ, Park SI, et al. MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group. Radiology 2002;224:410–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg 2000;135:148–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houdart R, Perniceni T, Darne B, et al. Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk. Am J Surg 1995;170:38–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg 1998;133:162–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes N, Marson LP, DeBeaux AC, et al. Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1176–1181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zidi SH, Prat F, Guen OL, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999;44:118–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 2000;55:25–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laing FC, Jeffrey RB Jr, Wing VW, et al. Biliary dilatation: defining the level and cause by real-time US. Radiology 1986;160:39–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 1996;347:75–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barish MA, Yucel EK, Ferrucci JT. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. N Engl J Med 1999;341:258–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craney B, Logan H. Exploration of the common bile duct—the relevance of clinical picture and importance of preoperative cholangiography. Br J Surg 1989;67:869–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips EH. Controversies in the management of common duct calculi. Surg Clin North Am 1994;74:931–948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger R, Wayand W. Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:6–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, et al. Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 2004;187:475–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pace BW, Cosgrove J, Breuer B, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography revisited. Arch Surg 1992;127:448–450

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Isla AM. Limitations of fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiography in cases suggestive of choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15:312–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barkun JS, Fried GM, Barkun AN, et al. Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 1993;218:371–379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston EH, Miller JA, Coan B, et al. Indications for selective intraoperative cholangiography. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:1371–1377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:547–557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:1364–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999;178:480–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park AE, Mastrangelo MJ Jr. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2000;14:219–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, et al. Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 1995;170:619–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:55–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? – a prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2000;32:3–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics 2001;21:23–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David V, Reinhold C, Hochman M, et al. Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1055–1059

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Normal Vaterian sphincter complex: evaluation of morphology and contractility with dynamic single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1497–1500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TK, Kim BS, Kim JH, et al. Diagnosis of intrahepatic stones: superiority of MR cholangiopancreatography over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:429–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Topal B, van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg 2003;90:42–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:191–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, et al. Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg 1992;215:209–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madden JL. Common duct stones: their origin and surgical management. Surg Clin North Am 1973;53:1095–1113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 


  • RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

    Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

    HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4