A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/BF02882158 below:

Nucleoli and related nuclear structures

  • Ahrens, W. 1939. Über das Auftreten von Nukleolenchromosomen mit endständigem Nukleolus in der Oogenese vonMytilicola intestinalis. Zeits. Wiss. Zool.152: 185–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alverdes, F. 1912. Die Kerne in den Speicheldrüsen derChironomus-Larve. Arch. Zellf.9: 168–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbiani, E. G. 1881. Sur la structure du noyau des cellules salivaires chez les larves deChironomus. Zool. Anz.4: 637–641, 662–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1883. Sur l'origine des cellules du follicule et du noyau vitellin de l'oeuf chez les Géophiles. Zool. Anz.6: 658–666, 676–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. 1933. Die wachsenden Oocytenkerne einiger Insekten in ihrem Verhalten zur Nuklealfärbung. Zeits. Zellf.18: 254–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1935. Der Aufbau der Chromosomen aus den Speicheldrüsen vonChironomus Thummi Kiefer. Zeits. Zellf.23: 280–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. A. 1941. Some criteria for judging the degree of polyploidy of cells in the resting stage. Am. Nat.75: 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, P. N. 1938. Root-tip smear technique and the differential staining of the nucleolus. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.58: 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. Cytological studies inOenothera with special reference to the relation of chromosomes to nucleoli. Proc. Roy. Soc. B128: 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1941a. Rapid smear methods with nucleolar stains. Chron. Bot.6: 319.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1941b. Cytological studies in the genusGaura. Ann. Bot. n. s.5: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, G. S. 1938. The cytology of some Indian wheats. Ann. Bot. n. s.2: 335–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, M. W. 1903. On the chromatin in the spermatocytes ofScolopendra heros. Biol. Bull.5: 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1905. On the karyosphere and nucleolus in the spermatocytes ofScolopendra subsinipes. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts & Sci.41: 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, W. 1840. On the minute structure and movements of voluntary muscle. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc.130: 457–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretschneider, L. H., andHirsch, G. C. 1937. Kernwachsthum und Nukleolengrösse bei den Eiern vonLima hians (Lamell.). Cytologia8: 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Ethel N. 1913. A study of the male germ cells ofNotonecta. Jour. Exp. Zool.14: 61–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderwood, W. L. 1892. A contribution to our knowledge of the ovary and intra-ovarian egg in Teleosteans. Jour. Mar. Biol. Assn. n. s.2: 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Camp, G. M. 1924. Le rôle du nucléole dans la caryocinèse somatique (Clivia miniata Reg.). La Cellule34: 5–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, E. E. 1913. The Mendelian ratio in relation to certain Orthopteran chromosomes. Jour. Morph.24: 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1931. The maturation divisions and segregation of heteromorphic homologous chromosomes in Acrididae (Orthoptera). Biol. Bull.61: 324–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, J. B. 1884. La biologie cellulaire. Étude comparée de la cellule dans les deux règnes. pp. 271.

  • Caspersson, T. 1939. Über die Rolle der Desoxyribosenukleinsaüre bei der Zellteilung. Chromosoma1: 147–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andSchultz, J. 1939. Pentose nucleotides in the cytoplasm of growing tissues. Nature143: 602–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,— 1940. Ribonucleic acids in both nucleus and cytoplasm, and the function of the nucleolus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.26: 507–515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside, D. G. 1932. The chromosomes of a new haploidOenothera. Cytologia4: 68–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. T. 1936. Observations on mitosis in Opalinids (Protozoa, Ciliata). II. The association of chromosomes and nucleoli. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.22: 602–607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claude, A. 1940. Particulate components of normal and tumor cells. Science91: 77–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. G. 1902. Karyokinesis and cytokinesis in the maturation, fertilization and cleavage ofCrepidula and other Gasteropoda. Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.12: 1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1912. Cell size and nuclear size. Jour. Exp. Zool.12: 1–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. G. 1941. Cell and protoplasm concepts: historical account. Publ. No. 14, Am. Assn. Adv. Sci. pp. 1–19.

  • Coleman, L. C. 1940. The cytology ofVeltheimia viridifolia Jacq. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 887–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey, H. I. 1940. Chromomere vesicles in Orthopteran cells. Jour. Morph.66: 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowdry, E. V. andKitchen, S. F. 1930. Intranuclear inclusions in yellow fever. Am. Jour. Hyg.11: 227–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, H. A., andS. W. Ransom. 1931. Ratio of cells to fibres and of myelinated to unmyelinated fibres in spinal nerve roots. Am. Jour. Anat.49: 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, W. H. 1934. The material continuity and individuality of the somatic chromosomes ofAmblystoma tigrinum with special reference to the nucleolus as a chromosomal component. Jour. Morph.56: 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay, L. 1926. Phylogenetische Chromosomeverkürzung. Zeits. Zellf.4: 338–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delay, C. 1940. Recherches sur le noyau des Légumineuses. Rev. Cytol. et Cytophysiol. Vég.4: 183–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloffre, G. 1939. Phénomènes traumatiques d'accroissement nucléaire chez le Lupin. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris208: 1110–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermen, H. 1933. Origin and behavior of the nucleolus in plants. Jour. Arn. Arb.14: 282–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, B. 1929. Entwicklung und Bau der Eier vonSalarius flavoumbrinus Rupp. Zool. Anz.83: 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, S. H. 1929. The reduction division in a haploidOenothera. La Cellule39: 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. 1939. Zytogenetische Untersuchungen anAntirrhinum majus L. Zeits. Bot.34: 81–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. Zytogenetische Untersuchungen an haploiden Pflanzen vonAntirrhinum majus L. I. Die Meiosis. Zeits. Bot.35: 161–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser, G. 1934. Cytological studies on egg fragments of the salamander Triton. V. Jour. Exp. Zool.68: 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faussek, W. 1913. Zur Frage über den Bau des Zellkernes in den Speicheldrüsen der Larve von Chironomus. Arch. Mikr. Anat.82: 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A. 1936. Les satellites chez les Narcisses. II. Les satellites pendant la mitose. Bot. Soc. Broteriana11: 87–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feulgen, R. 1924. Neue Wege zum biologisch-histologischen Studium der Zellkerne. Ber. Ges. Physiol.22: 489–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fikry, M. A. 1930. Phenomena of heterotypic division in the pollen mother cells of a tetraploid form ofRumex scutatus var.typicus. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.50: 387–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, G. M. 1932. Intranuclear bodies in the liver-cells of mice. Brit. Jour. Exp. Path.13: 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. 1934. Grössenveränderung von Kern und Nucleolus im Blattgewebe. Planta22: 767–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana. 1781. Traité sur le venin de la vipère avec des observations sur la structure primitive du corps animal.

  • Francini, E. 1939. A proposita del potere cromotropo del nucleolo. Nuovo Gior. Bot. Ital.45: 558–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortak, G. 1931. Die Cytologie der Keimung einer Zingiberacee und einer Piperacee. Bot. Arch.33: 97–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, M. S. 1927. Oogenesis inLimulus polyphemus, with special reference to the behavior of the nucleolus. Jour. Morph.44: 217–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatenby, J. B. 1922. The cytoplasmic inclusions of the germ cells. X. The gametogenesis ofSaccocirrus. Quart. Jour. Mikr. Sci.66: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. 1910. The material basis of Mendelian phenomena. Am. Nat.44: 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1912. Somatic mitosis inOenothera. Ann. Bot.26: 993–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. 1937. The discovery of the relation between the nucleolus and the chromosomes. Cytologia, Fujii Vol. pp. 977–986.

  • — 1938. The structure of the chromosome. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.58: 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. Nucleoli, satellites and sex chromosomes. Nature144: 794–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. 1942. Some observations regarding the nucleolus and cytoplasm in living marine eggs. Biol. Bull. [In press.]

  • —, andLatter, J. 1927. Observations on the pollen development of two species of Lathraea. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.47: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andPathak, G. N. 1938. Chromosome structure. Nature142: 156–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geitler, L. 1935. Neue Untersuchungen über die Mitosen vonSpirogyra. Arch. Protistenk.85: 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1935. Untersuchungen über den Kernbau vonSpirogyra mittels Feulgens Nuklealfärbung. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.53: 270–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersch, M. 1940. Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung der Nucleolen im Zellkern. Zeits. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat. A30: 483–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, T. H., andAvery, P. 1939. Trisomic and other types inNicotiana sylvestris. Jour. Genet.38: 381–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, K. 1903. Ueber den Nucleolen in reifenden Echinodermenei und seine Bedeutung. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Anat.19: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haga, T. 1934. The comparative morphology of the chromosome complement in the tribe Parideae. Jour. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. V.3: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammett, F. S. 1938. A correlation between sulfhydryl, mitosis and cell growth in length in roots ofPhaseolus vulgaris. Growth2: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, O. 1919. Über das Verhalten des Zell-, Kern- und Nucleolengrösse und ihre gegenseitigen Beziehungen bei Cladoceren während des Wachstums, des Generationscyclus und unter dem Einfluss aüsserer Faktoren. Arch. Zellf.15: 1–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilborn, O. 1939. Chromosome studies in the Cyperaceae. III–IV. Hereditas25: 224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz, E. 1925. Das Verhalten von Kern und Chloroplasten bei Regeneration. Zeits. Zellf.2: 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1931. Die Ursache der gesetzmässigen Zahl, Lage, Form und Grösse pflanzlicher Nukleolen. Planta12: 775–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1936. Die Nucleal-Quetschmethode. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.53: 870–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneguy, L. F. 1896. Leçons sur la cellule. pp. 541.

  • Van Herwerden, M. A. 1911. Ueber den Kernfaden und den Nucleolus in den Speicheldrüsenkernen der Chironomuslarve. Anat. Anz.38: 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hett, J. 1937a. Über den Anstritt von Kernsubstanzen in das Protoplasma. Zeits. Zellf.26: 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1937b. Weitere Befunde über den Austritt von Kernsubstanzen in das Protoplasma. Zeits. Zellf.26: 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillary, B. B. 1939. Use of the Feulgen reaction in cytology. I. Effect of fixatives on the reaction. Bot. Gaz.101: 276–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. II. New techniques and special applications. Bot. Gaz.102: 225–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, L. 1920. Parallel conjugation and the prophase complex in Periplaneta with special reference to the premeiotic telophase. Proc. Royal Soc. B91: 305–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. 1938. Über die Formveränderung der Randnukleolen der wachsenden Oozyten bei einem Knockenfisch mit besonderer Berücksichtigung auf die Frage über den Austritt der Nukleolarsubstanz ins Zytoplasma. Cytologia9: 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, N. K. 1939. Cytological investigations on the genusCicer. Ann. Bot. n. s.3: 271–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, K. T. 1940a. Chromosome catenation inOenothera. Bot. Gaz.102: 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1940b. Chromosome numbers and the relationship between satellites and nucleoli inCassia and certain other Leguminosae. Ann. Bot. n. s.4: 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1941. Certain abnormalities in the root tips of cotton. Current Sci.10: 174–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, M. 1913. Zellenstudien. I. Morphologische Beiträge zum Problem des Eiwachsthums. Arch. Zellf.10: 1–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B. P. 1934. Somatic mitoses ofDrosophila melanogaster. Jour. Morph.56: 125–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B. P. 1937. Morphology of the chromosomes ofDrosophila ananassae. Cytologia, Fujii Vol. pp. 1043–1055.

  • — 1938. Nucleolus-organizing regions in salivary gland chromosomes ofDrosophila melanogaster. Zeits. Zellf.28: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi, E. 1938. Der Einfluss der Eierbehandlung mit Zentrifugierung auf die Vererbung bei dem Seidenspinner. III. Beweise für die Beziehung der Geschlechtschromosomen zu den Nukleolen. Cytologia9: 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. L., andBeams, H. W. 1934. Somatic synapsis inChironomus, with special reference to the individuality of the chromosomes. Jour. Morph.56: 577–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruck, M. 1931. Physiologische und cytologische Studien über die Utriculariablase. Bot. Arch.33: 257–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudo, R. 1922. On the morphology and life history of a myxosporidian,Leptothece ohlmacheri, parasite inRana clamitans andR. pipiens. Parasitol.14: 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwada, Y., andSugimato, T. 1928. On the staining reactions of chromosomes. Protoplasma3: 531–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latter, J. 1926. The pollen development ofLathyrus odoratus. Ann. Bot.40: 277–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesley, M. M. 1938. The relation between satellite size and nucleolus in three races ofSolanum lycopersicum. Genetics23: 485–493.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levan, A. 1935. Cytological studies inAllium. VI. The chromosome morphology of some diploid species ofAllium. Hereditas20: 289–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. The cytology ofAllium amplectens and the occurrence in nature of its asynapsis. Hereditas26: 353–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. H. 1922. Endothelium in tissue cultures. Am. Jour. Anat.30: 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillie, F. R. 1912. Studies of fertilization III. IV. Jour. Exp. Zool.12: 413–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. E. 1940. Study of a nuclear and cytoplasmic relation inScyllina cyanipes (Orthoptera). Jour. Morph.67: 567–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loretti, F., andPerroncito, G. 1938. Ergastoplasma, caratteri nucleari e nucleolari, amitosi e mitose atipiche in parotidi iperattive diEpimys nucvegicus (var.albina) Erxl. Zeits. Zellf.28: 12–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, J. 1861. Notes on the generative organs and on the formation of the egg in the Annulosa. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc.151: 595–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, A. M. 1940. The cytology of fox encephalitis and the effects of centrifugation upon the intranuclear inclusions. Am. Jour. Path.16: 739–760.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M. S. 1930. Results obtained from applying the Feulgen reaction to Protozoa. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.27: 258–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andEvans, C. A. 1935. Correlation of qualitative microchemical tests in the protozoan nucleus and the mode of nutrition. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.55: 261–264.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ludford, R. J. 1922. The morphology and physiology of the nucleolus. Part I. The nucleolus in the germ-cell cycle of the molluscLimnaea stagnalis Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.1922: 113–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1924. Nuclear activity during melanosis, with special reference to melanin formation in a melanotic sarcoma. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.1924: 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1925a. Cell organs during secretion in the epididymus. Proc. Royal Soc. B98: 354–372.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1925b. Nuclear activity in tissue cultures. Proc. Royal Soc. B98: 457–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1928. The chromatin content of normal and malignant cells, as demonstrated by Feulgen's “Nuclealreaction.” Proc. Royal Soc. B102: 397–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. 1934. The relation of a particular chromosomal element to the development of the nucleoli inZea mays. Zeits. Zellf.21: 294–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, C. 1906. The behavior of the nucleoli during oogenesis of the dragon-fly, with special reference to synapsis. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Anat.23: 207–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, A. G. 1931. The morphology of the chromosomes inPisum sativum. Cytologia2: 318–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura, H. 1938. Chromosome studies onTrillium kamtschaticum Pall. VI. On the nucleolus-chromosome relationship. Cytologia9: 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, A. D. 1898. The origin and behavior of the centrosomes in the Annelid egg. Jour. Morph.14: 181–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medwedewa, G. B. 1930. Ueber die ‘Trabanten’ beiCrepis dioscoridis L. Zeits. f. Zellforsh. u. Mikr. Anat.10: 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensinkai, S. W. 1939a. Cytogenetic studies in the genusAllium. Jour. Genet.39: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939b. The conception of the satellite and the nucleolus, and the behavior of these bodies in cell division. Ann. Bot. n. s.3: 763–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939c. The structure and behavior of chromosomes in somatic mitosis. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.59: 82–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. 1918. Die biologische Bedeutung der Nucleolen. Zool. Anz.49: 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMol, W. E. 1928. Nucleolar number and size in diploid, triploid and aneuploid Hyacinths. La Cellule38: 7–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMol, W. E. 1937. D'un hybride d'espèces de Narcissus et de sa mutation somatique à la duplication du nombre des chromosomes et des nucléoles. Cytologia, Fujii Vol., pp. 633–640.

  • Montgomery, T. H. 1898. Comparative cytological studies, with special regard to the morphology of the nucleolus. Jour. Morph.15: 265–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, H. K. 1936. The chromosome morphology, secondary association and origin of cultivated rice. Jour. Genet.33: 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1937. Cytological investigations of rice varieties. Cytologia8: 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, V. 1925. Cell inclusion in the oogenesis of scorpions. Proc. Royal Soc. B98: 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navashin, M. 1926. Variabilität des Zellkerns beiCrepis-Arten in Bezug auf die Artbildung. Zeits. Zellf.4: 171–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. Chromosome alterations caused by hybridization and their bearing upon certain general genetic problems. Cytologia5: 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navashin, S. 1912. Sur le dimorphisme nucléaire des cellules somatiques deGaltonia candicans. Bull. Imp. Acad. Sci. Petersburg6: 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1927. Zellkerndimorphismus beiGaltonia candicans Des. und einigen verwandten Monokotylen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.45: 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J. andD. 1930. On phosphorous metabolism in embryonic life. I. Invertebrate eggs. Jour. Exp. Biol.7: 317–348.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, E. R. 1941. Nuclear cycles in the life history of the Protozoan genusCeratomyxa. Jour. Morph.69: 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, M. 1883. Die Veränderung der Pancreaszellen bei der Sekretion. Arch. Anat. u. Physiol., Phys. Abt.1883: 405–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oka, T. B. 1940. Extrusion of a nucleolusin toto, found in the ovarian oocytes ofHolothuria monacaria. Cytologia10: 545–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy, N. 1938. Further studies inOryza. Cytologia9: 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939. Cytological studies in Phalarideae. Ann. Bot.3: 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthak, G. N. 1940a. Studies in the cytology ofCrocus. Ann. Bot.4: 227–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. Studies in the cytology ofOenothera. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940c. Studies in the cytology of cereals. Jour. Genet.39: 437–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, D. F., andMetz, C. W. 1938. Studies on the structure of nucleolus-forming regions and related structures in the giant salivary gland chromosomes of Diptera. Jour. Morph.63: 363–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, T. S. andVenkatasubban, K. R. 1939. The cytology ofCrataeva religiosa Forst. Cytologia10: 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujam, S. 1937. Cytological behaviour of an autotriploid in rice (Oryza sativa). Jour. Genet.35: 183–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1938. Chromosome studies in the Oryzeae. Ann. Bot.2: 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenow, E. 1928. Ergebnisse mit der Nuclealfärbung bei Protozoen. Arch. Protistenk.61: 144–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resende, F. 1937. Über die Ubiquität der SAT-Chromosomen bei den Blütenpflanzen. Planta26: 757–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939. Über das Verhalten des SAT-Fadens. Planta29: 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940a. Über die Chromosomenstruktur in der Mitose der Wurzelspitze. II. SAT-differentiation, Spiralbau und Chromonemata. Chromosoma1: 486–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. Die Nukleolen beiAntirrhinum majus L. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.58: 460–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribbands, C. R. 1941. Meiosis in Diptera. I. Prophase associations of nonhomologous chromosomes, and their relation to mutual attraction between centromeres, centrosomes and chromosome ends. Jour. Genet.41: 411–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satina, S., Bergner, A. D., andBlakeslee, A. F. 1941. Morphological differentiation in chromosomes ofDatura stramonium. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, D. 1938. Karyotypes in Amaryllidaceae with special reference to the SAT-chromosome. Cytologia9: 203–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. Karyotype analysis inTricyrtis andBrachycyrtis with special reference to SAT—and nucleolar chromosomes. Cytologia10: 127–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, D. B. O. 1939. Nuclear structure and behavior in species of the Uredinales. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 585–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayles, L. P. 1927. Origin of the mesoderm and behavior of the nucleolus in regeneration inLumbriculus. Biol. Bull.52: 278–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, R. 1887. On the intra-ovarian egg of some osseous fishes. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci.28: 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, F. 1940. The formation of tetrads and the meiotic mitoses in the male ofRhytidolomia senilis Say. Jour. Morph.67: 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, K. E. 1915. Ueber Kern-und Plasmaveränderungen in Fettzellen während des Fettansatzes. Anat. Anz.48: 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J., Caspersson, T., andAquilonius, L. 1940. The genetic control of nucleolar composition. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.26: 515–523.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwann, T. 1839. Mikroskopische Untersuchungen. Ostwald's Klassiker der Exakten Wissens. No. 176. 1910.

  • Selim, A. G. 1930. A cytological study ofOryza sativa L. Cytologia2: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmens, C. S. 1940. Nature of the Feulgen reaction with nucleic acid. Nature146: 130–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andBhaduri, P. N. 1939. A technic for differential staining of nucleoli and chromosomes. Stain Tech.14: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—. 1941. Staining the nucleolus. Stain Tech.16: 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L. W. 1934. Introduction to cytology. 3rd Edition.

  • Sheffield, F. M. L. 1927. Cytological studies of certain meiotic stages inOenothera. Ann. Bot.41: 799–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941. The cytoplasmic and nuclear inclusions associated with severe etch virus. Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc.61: 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinke, N., andShigenaga, M. 1933. A histochemical study of plant nuclei in rest and mitosis. Cytologia4: 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, S. M. 1940a. A study of chromosome catenation inOenothera. Jour. Genet.39: 309–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. Study of the somatic chromosomes inNarcissus. Ann. Bot.4: 427–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940c. Cytogenetics ofBrassica hybrids and species. Jour. Genet.40: 441–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinotô, Y. 1938. Karyotype analysis inPaeonia. I. Cytologia9: 254–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearing, J. K. 1937. Cytological studies of the Myxophyceae. Arch. Protistenk.89: 209–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinath, K. V. 1939. Morphological and cytological studies in the genusCalceolaria. IV. Somatic chromosomes. Zeits. Abst. Vererb.77: 104–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. Meiosis in diploid and aneuploid calceolarias. Cytologia10: 457–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stough, H. B. 1931. Modified mitosis in the chick embryo. Jour. Morph.52: 535–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1935. Further studies in modified mitosis. Jour. Morph.58: 221–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M. K. 1935. Oogenesis ofClibanarius olivaceus (Henderson), with special reference to a seasonal variation in the cytoplasmic inclusions. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.55: 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andAiyar, R. G. 1935. Oogenesis ofAcentrogobius Neilli (Gobius Neilli Day), with special reference to the behaviour of the nucleoli. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.55: 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svedelius, N. 1937. The apomeiotic tetrad division inLomentaria rosea in comparison with the normal development inL. clavellosa. Symbolae Bot. Upsal.2: 2, pp. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, N. 1939. Chromosome studies in the Cyperaceae. IV. Chromosome number ofCarex species. Cytologia10: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. Chromosome studies in the Cyperaceae. VIII. Meiosis in diploid and tetraploid forms ofCarex siderosticta Hance. Cytologia11: 282–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatuno, S. 1941. Zytologische Untersuchungen über die Lebermoose von Japan. Jour. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. (Botany)4: 73–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. R. 1926. Chromosome morphology inFritillaria, Alstroemeria, Silphium, and other genera. Am. Jour. Bot.13: 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uber, F. M., andElls, V. R. 1941. The ultraviolet absorption spectrum of crystalline ribonuclease. Jour. Biol. Chem.141: 229–230.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andMcLaren, A. D. 1941. A photochemical yield for the inactivation of crystalline trypsin. Jour. Biol. Chem.141: 231–237.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valentin, G. 1836. Repertorium für Anatomie und Physiologie. Vol. I. Vol. IV. 1839. pp. 392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. 1835. Einige Bemerkungen und Fragen über das Keimbläschen (vesicula germinativa). Muller's Arch. Anat., Physiol. u. Wiss. Med. (From Montgomery.)

  • Walcott, G. B. 1939. The nucleolus-chromosome inPallavicinia lyellii. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warmke, H. E., andJohansen, D. A. 1935. Chromosomes of the Liliaceae. II.Trillium. Am. Jour. Bot.22: 694–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenrich, D. H. 1941. The morphology of some Protozoan parasites in relation to microtechnique. Jour. Parasitol.27: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, M. A. 1935. Observations on nuclear structure in the Florideae. Beih. Bot. Centlbl.53A: 564–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. 1941. The cytology of the cricket bat willow (Salix alba var.caerulea) Ann. Bot.5: 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. 1913. A chromatoid body simulating an accessory chromosome inPentatoma. Biol. Bull.24: 392–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B., 1925. The cell.

  • DeWiniwarter, H. 1912. Études sur la spermatogenèse humaine Arch. de Biol.27: 91–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. W. 1937. The nucleolus inTulipa. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 528–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasui, K. 1938. Myelin forms in acetocarmine smear preparations. Lecithin as a nuclear constituent. Cytologia9: 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, J. S. 1925. The nucleolus ofTmesipteris tannensis Bernh. Proc. Royal Soc. B98: 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuasa, A. 1937. Studies in the cytology of Pteridophyta. XIII. Some effects of chromic acid on Feulgen's nucleal-reaction. Cytologia8: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, E. 1885. Über den Nukleolus. Bot. Zeit.43: 257–265, 273–283, 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, C. 1928. Nucleolus in root tip meristem ofZea mays. Bot. Gaz.86: 402–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1930. Nucleoli of the root tip and cambium ofPinus strobus. Cytologia2: 85–105.

    Google Scholar 


  • RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

    Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

    HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4