A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/BF02244757 below:

Dynamics of behavioral sensitization induced by the dopamine agonist quinpirole and a proposed central energy control mechanism

  • Alexander RMN (1982) Locomotion of animals. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist B (1983) Psychosis induced by central nervous system stimulants and related drugs. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Antelman SM (1988a) Stressor-induced sensitization to subsequent stress: implications for the development and treatment of clinical disorders. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. Telford Press, Caldwell, N.J., pp 227–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Antelman SM (1988b) Time-dependent sensitization as the corner stone for a new approach to pharmacotherapy: drugs as foreign/stressful stimuli. Drug Dev Res 14:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Antelman SM, Caggiula AR (1991) The effects of acute stressor and drugs grow with the passage of time. In: Oliviero A, Puglisi-Allegra S (eds) Psychobiology of stress. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Antelman SM, Chiodo LA (1983) Amphetamine as a stressor. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 269–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Antelman SM, Eichler AJ, Black CA, Kocan D (1980) Interchangeability of stress and amphetamine in sensitization. Science 207:329–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigland-Ritchie B, Jones DA, Hosking GP, Edwards RHT (1978) Central and peripheral fatigue in sustained maximum voluntary contractions of human quadriceps muscle. Clin Sci Molec Med 54:609–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp DM, Robinson TE (1988) Susceptibility to sensitization. I. Sex differences in the enduring effects of chronic d-amphetamine treatment on locomotion, stereotyped behavior and brain monoamines. Behav Brain Res 30:55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro R, Abreu P, Calzadilla CH, Rodriguez M (1985) Increased or decreased locomotor response in rats following repeated adminstration of apomorphine depends on dosage interval. Psychopharmacology 85:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudry IA, Turkanis SA, Karler R (1988) Characteristics of “reverse tolerance” to amphetamine-induced locomotor stimulation in mice. Neuropharmacology 27:777–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagg AI (1973) Gaits in mammals. Mammal Rev 3:135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RHT (1978) Physiological analysis of skeletal muscle weakness and fatigue. Clin Sci Molec Med 54:463–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Golani I (1989) Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment. Behav Brain Res 34:199–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Szechtman H (1989) Biphasic effect of D2 agonist quinpirole on locomotion and movements. Eur J Pharmacol 161:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Szechtman H (1990) Dosing regimen differentiates sensitization of locomotion and mouthing to D2-agonist quinpirole. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 36:989–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Canaran G, Szechtman H (1989a) Compulsive and rigid locomotion by chronic treatment with the D2 agonist quinpirole. Neurosci Abstr 15:1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Golani I, Szechtman H (1989b) D2 agonist quinpirole induces perseveration of routes and hyperactivity but no perseveration of movements. Brain Res 490:255–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Clements KVA, Szechtman H (1991) Differential effects of D1 and D2 dopamine agonists on stereotyped locomotion in rats. Behav Brain Res 45:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Szechtman H, Spear LP (1992a) Quinpirole alters quadruped activity in rats from the second postnatal week. Dev Psychobiol 25:275–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Talangbayan H, Canaran G, Szechtman H (1992b) Dopaminergic control of locomotion, mouthing, snout contact, and grooming: opposing roles of D1 and D2 receptors. Psychopharmacology 106:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Talangbayan H, Dai H, Canaran G, Szechtman H (1992c) Profile of behavioral changes during the course of chronic treatment with D2-agonist quinpirole. Neurosci Abstr 18:887

    Google Scholar 

  • Einat H, Szechtman H (1993a) Environmental modulation of both locomotor response and locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 4:399–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Einat H, Szechtman H (1993b) Longlasting consequences of chronic treatment with the dopamine agonist quinipirole for the undrugged behavior of rats. Behav Brain Res 54:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellinwood EH (1967) Amphetamine psychosis. I. Description of the individuals and process. J Nerv Ment Dis 144:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellinwood EH (1968) Amphetamine psychosis. II. Theoretical implications. J Neuropsychiatry 4:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison GD (1979) Animal models of psychopathology: studies in naturalistic colony environments. In: Keehn JD (ed) Psychopathology in animals. Academic Press, New York, pp 81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshkol N, Wachmann A (1958) Movement Notation. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fentress JC (1976) Dynamic boundaries of patterned behavior: interaction and self-organization. In: Bateson PPG, Hinde RA (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 135–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed CR, Yamamoto BK (1985) Regional brain dopamine metabolism: a marker for the speed, direction, and posture of moving animals. Science 229:62–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried Y, Agassi J (1976) Paranoia: a case study in diagnosis. Kluwer Academic, Rediel Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer MA, Russi PV, Masten VL (1986) Multivariate assessment of locomotor behavior: pharmacological and behavioral analyses. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:277–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam PE, Spirduso WW, Martin TP, Walters TJ, Wilcox RE, Farrar RP (1984) The effects of exercise training on [3H]-spiperone binding in rat striatum. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:863–867

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes MP (1983) Limitation of exercise performance by activity of intracerebral dopaminergic synapses. Unpublished PhD dissertation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes MP, Garnett ES, Coates G (1985) Central dopaminergic activity influences rats ability to exercise. Life Sci 36:671–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes MP, Garnett ES, Coates G (1988) Nigrostriatal dopaminergic activity is increased during exhaustive exercise in rats. Life Sci 42:1537–1542

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand M (1989) The quadrupedal gaits of vertebrates. Bioscience 39:766–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayahi M, Okada S, Tadokoro S (1991) Comparison of sensitization to ambulation-increasing effects of cocaine and methamphetamine after repeated administration in mice. J Pharm Pharmacol 43:827–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DC, Wise RA (1992) Locomotor activating effects of the D2 agonist bromocriptine show environment-specific sensitization following repeated injections. Psychopharmacology 107:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperato A, Tanda G, Frau R, DiChiara G (1988) Pharmacological profile of dopamine receptor agonists as studied by brain dialysis in behaving rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 245:257–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas PW, Stewart J (1991) Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Res Rev 16:223–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Karler R, Chaudhry IA, Calder LD, Turkanis SA (1990) Amphetamine sensitization and the excitatory amino acids. Brain Res 537:76–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinidis L, Anisman H (1980) Amphetamine models of amphetamine paranoid schizophrenia: an overview and elaboration of animal experimentation. Psychol Bull 88:551–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon M, Robbins T (1975) The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: a general theory concerning amphetamine effects. Curr Dev Psychopharmacol 2:80–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Iverson MT, Stahl SM, Iversen SD, (1988) Chronic administration of a selective dopamine D2 agonist: factors determining behavioral tolerance and sensitization. Psychopharmacology 95:534–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly BA, Gotsick JE (1989) Conditioning and experiential factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behav Neurosci 103:1311–1317

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly BA, Rowlett JK, Lovell G (1993) Effects of daily SKF 38393, quinpirole, and SCH 23390 treatments on locomotor activity and subsequent sensitivity to apomorphine. Psychopharmacology 110:320–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux JP (1965) On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J Mol Biol 12:88–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza PV, Deminière JM, LeMoal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511–1513

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM (1980) Intermittent vs continuous stimulation: effect of time interval on the development of sensitization or tolerance. Life Sci 26:1275–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Contel NR (1981) Cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization: a model for recurrent manic illness. In: Perris C, Struwe G, Jansson B (eds) Biological psychiatry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 746–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Weiss SRB (1988) Sensitization and kindling: implications for the evolution of psychiatric symptomatology. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system, Telford Press, Caldwell, N.J., pp 257–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE (1984) Behavioral sensitization: characterization of enduring changes in rotational behavior produced by intermittent injections of amphetamine in male and female rats. Psychopharmacology 84:466–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986) Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11:157–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS, Schuckit MA (1983) Animal models of stimulant-induced psychosis. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 131–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS, Kuchenski R (1987) Individual differences in responsiveness to single and repeated amphetamine administration: behavioral characteristics and neurochemical correlates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 242:917–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J (1992) Neurobiology of conditioning to drugs of abuse. Ann NY Acad Sci 654:335–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Vezina P (1988) Conditioning and behavioural sensitization. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. Telford Press, Caldwell, N.J., pp 207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Vezina P (1989) Microinjections of SCH23390 into the ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra pars reticulata attenuate the development of sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of systemic amphetamine. Brain Res 495:401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam S, Lucki I, McGonigle P (1992) Effects of chronic treatment with selective agonists on the subtypes of dopamine receptors. Brain Res 571:313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Szechtman H, Ornstein K, Teitelbaum P, Golani I (1982) Snout contact fixation, climbing, and gnawing during apomorphine stereotypy in rats from two substrains. Eur J Pharmacol 80:385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Szechtman H, Cleghorn JM, Brown GM, Kaplan RD, Franco S, Rosenthal K (1988a) Sensitization and tolerance to apomorphine in men: yawning, growth hormone, nausea, and hyperthermia. Psychiatry Res 23:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Szechtman H, Eilam D, Teitelbaum P, Golani I (1988b) A different look at measurement and interpretation of drug-induced behavior. Psychobiology 16:164–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Szechtman H, Canaran G, Ibrahim F, Eilam D (1989) Nonlinear sensitization of activity produced by chronic treatment with the D2 agonist quinpirole. Neurosci Abstr 15:1156

    Google Scholar 

  • Szechtman H, Talangbayan H, Eilam D (1993) Environmental and behavioral components of sensitization induced by the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 4:405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Szechtman H, Dai H, Mustafa S, Einat H, Sullivan R (1994) Effects of dose and interdose interval on locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Pharmacol Biochem Behav (in press)

  • Van Hartesveldt C, Cottrell GA, Potter T, Meyer ME (1992) Effects of intracerebral quinpirole on locomotion in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 214:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner P, Papp S, Cheeta S and Muscat R (1992) Environmental influences on behavioural sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behavioural Pharmacology 3:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf ME, Khansa MR (1991) Repeated administration of MK-801 produces sensitization to its own locomotor stimulant effects but blocks sensitization to amphetamine. Brain Res 562:164–168

    Google Scholar 


  • RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

    Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

    HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4