The spectral properties of the normal electric organ discharge (EOD) ofApteronotus recorded from several different regions of the body are described and related to the known filter properties of the electroreceptors. Amplitude modulations (AMs) of these local EOD waveforms caused by various highly conducting (metal) and non-conducting (plastic) objects are also described. Object size, shape, velocity relative to the animal and object distance from the animal all influence the timecourse as well as the size of these amplitude modulations. Increases in object size result in a longer duration AM whose spectral composition is limited to lower frequencies. A measure of the width of the amplitude spectra of object-caused AMs changes with the −0.49 power of object diameter when metal spheres moving at a given distance lateral to the fish are used as stimuli (Fig. 2A). Increases in object diameter also increase the amplitude of the AM recorded across the skin of the animal. The change in EOD amplitude (μV peak-to-peak) increases with the 1.6 power of sphere diameter (Fig. 10 A). Velocity of the object can have no effect upon the amplitude of the AM but measures of the bandwidth of the AM increases linearly with velocity as is shown in Fig. 1 D for a 6.4 mm metal sphere. Increases in distance between the moving object and the side of the fish cause only minor changes in the bandwidth of the AM, bandwidth decreases as the distance increases (Fig. 2B), however, amplitude of the AM decreases very rapidly with increasing distance (Fig. 8 A and C).
Receptor responses to a series of electronically produced AMs of the EOD of various amplitudes and frequencies were studied. Knowledge of these receptor properties taken together with the information about the types of AM produced by various moving objects allows predictions to be made of the manner in which variations in object size and rate of movement will influence receptor responses. The relationships between changes in receptor activity and increased EOD amplitude are well fit by power functions having slopes ranging from 0.65 to 0.87 (Fig. 7). The receptors also show different degrees of respon-siveness dependent on the frequency of AM used. The most effective frequency was in the neighborhood of 64 Hz. Single cycles of sinusoidal AM gave similar responses as continuous sinusoidal AM.
The responses of receptors to various sized objects moving at sequentially greater distances lateral to the fish are described and these are compared with the changes in voltage across the skin caused by the same stimulus (Fig. 8). The receptive fields, or areas through which a given sized object can move and still influence a single receptor's firing frequency, were mapped with a small metal sphere. Changes in firing of at least 40% of the peak change in action potential frequency caused by the object can be evoked when the object is within an area measuring about 61 mm2. Changes in frequency above a smaller percentage can be evoked from larger areas and larger changes from smaller areas (Fig. 11B).
A numerical method for determining the receptive field size, the area of skin that will receive a change in EOD amplitude greater or equal to a specified amount, due to spherical metal objects of various sizes at a given distance lateral to the fish is described in conjunction with Fig. 11 A. These predicted receptive field sizes are compared with actual measurements of receptive field sizes mapped with a 6.4 mm diameter metal sphere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article Subscribe and saveSpringer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
Price includes VAT (Germany)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. Abbreviationsamplitude modulation
average response histogram
electric organ discharge
Bastian J (1974) Electrosensory input to the corpus cerebelli of the high frequency electric fishEigenmannia virescens. J Comp Physiol 90:1–24
Bastian J (1975) Receptive fields of cerebellar cells receiving exteroceptive input in a Gymnotoid fish. J Neurophysiol 38:285–300
Bastian J (1976) Frequency response characteristics of electroreceptors in weakly electric fish (Gymnotoidei) with a pulse discharge. J Comp Physiol 112:165–180
Bastian J (1977) Variations in the frequency response of electroreceptors dependent on receptor location in a weakly electric fish (Gymnotoidei) with a pulse discharge. J Comp Physiol 121:53–64
Bastian J (1981) Electrolocation. II. The effects of moving objects and other electrical stimuli on the activities of two categories of posterior lateral line lobe cells inApteronotus albifrons. J Comp Physiol 144:481–494
Bell CC (1979) Central nervous system physiology of electroreception, a review. J Physiol (Paris) 75:261–279
Bennett MVL (1971) Electroreception. In: Hoar WS, Randall DH (eds) Fish physiology, vol V. Academic Press, New York, pp 493–574
Enger PS, Szabo T (1965) Activity of central neurons involved in electroreception in some weakly electric fish. J Neurophysiol 28:800–818
Glaser EM, Ruchkin DS (1976) Principles of neurobiological signal analysis. Academic Press, New York
Granath CP, Sachs HG, Erskin FT (1967) Electrical sensitivity of a weakly electric fish. Life Sci 6:2373–2377
Hagiwara S, Szabo T, Enger PS (1965) Electroreceptor mechanisms in a high frequency electric fish,Sternarchus albifrons. J Neurophysiol 28:784–799
Heiligenberg W (1973) Electrolocation of objects in the electric fish,Eigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gynmotoidei). J Comp Physiol 87:137–164
Heiligenberg W (1975) Theoretical and experimental approaches to spatial aspects of electrolocation. J Comp Physiol 103:247–272
Heiligenberg W (1977) Principles of electrolocation and jamming avoidance in electric fish, a neuroethological approach. Braitenberg V (ed) Studies of brain function, vol 1. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Heiligenberg W, Baker C, Bastian J (1978) The jamming avoidance response in Gymnotoid pulse-species. A mechanism to minimize the probability of pulse-train coincidence. J Comp Physiol 124:211–224
Hopkins CD (1976) Stimulus filtering and electroreception: Tuberous electroreceptors in three species of Gymnotid fish. J Comp Physiol 111:171–207
Hopkins CD (1981) Functions and mechanisms in electroreception. In: Northcut RG, Davis R (eds) Fish neurobiology and behavior. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (in press)
Hopkins CD, Heiligenberg W (1978) Evolutionary designs for electric signals and electroreceptors in Gymnotoid fishes of Surinam. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:113–134
Hoshimiya N, Shogen K, Matsuo T, Chichibu S (1980) TheApteronotus EOD field: Waveform and EOD field simulation. J Comp Physiol 135:283–290
Knudsen El (1974) Behavioral thresholds to electric signals in high frequency electric fish. J Comp Physiol 91:333–353
Knudsen El (1975) Spatial aspects of the electric fields generated by weakly electric fish. J Comp Physiol 99:103–118
Lissmann HW, Machin KE (1958) The mechanism of object loca tion inGymnarchus niloticus and similar fish. J Exp Biol 35:451–486
McCreery DB (1977) Spatial organization of receptive fields of lateral lemniscus neurons of the lateral line lobe of the catfishIctalurus nebulosus. J Comp Physiol 113:341–353
Philbrick/Nexus (1968) Application manual for operational amplifiers. Nimrod Press, Boston
Scheich H, Bullock TH (1974) The detection of electric fields from electric organs. In: Fessard A(ed) Handbook of senory physiology, vol III/3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 201–256
Scheich H, Bullock TH, Hamstra RJ Jr (1973) Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: High frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish,Eigenmannia. J Neurophysiol 36:39–60
Szabo T (1965) Sense organs of the lateral line system in some electric fish of the Gymnotidae, Mormyridae, and Gymnarchidae. J Morphol 117:229–250
Viancour TA (1970) Electroreceptors of a weakly electric fish II. Individually tuned receptor oscillations. J Comp Physiol 133:327–338
Viancour TA (1979) Peripheral electrosense physiology: a review of recent findings. J Physiol (Paris) 75:321–333
Watson D, Bastian J (1979) Frequency response characteristics of electroreceptors in the weakly electric fish,Gymnotus carapo. J Comp Physiol 134:191–202
Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
Joseph Bastian
I am grateful to Drs. J. Matsubara, W. Heiligenberg, C. Hopkins, L. Maler, T.H. Bullock, and C. Bell for many useful suggestions concerning this work. I also thank P. Barton and J. Sims for help with the manuscript. Supported by NIH Grant RO1NS-12337.
About this article Cite this articleBastian, J. Electrolocation. J. Comp. Physiol. 144, 465–479 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326832
Accepted: 15 July 1981
Issue Date: December 1981
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326832
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4