A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/BF00590957 below:

Cholecystocholangiography vs cystic duct cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Abstract

Intraoperative cholangiography performed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides an exact picture of the biliary anatomy. It may prevent iatrogenic bile duct injury and detect unsuspected common duct stones. Laparoscopic cannulation of the cystic duct can be difficult and time-consuming. We therefore evaluated the simpler technique of cholecystocholangiography by direct puncture and filling of the gallbladder with contrast medium. This technique was compared with cystic duct cholangiography in a prospective controlled trial of 69 patients. Cystic duct cholangiography (n=38) showed significantly better results than cholecystocholangiography (n=31) with optimal visualization of the biliary tree in 29 cases (76%) and seven cases (22%), respectively. The failure rate was 8% and 52%, respectively. Delineation of the cystic duct junction is important in order to prevent bile duct injury. The anatomy in this region was clearly delineated in 34 cases (89.5%) using cystic duct cholangiography but only in 11 cases (35.5%) with cholecystocholangiography. Cystic duct cholangiography revealed unsuspected common duct stones in three cases; however, choledocholithiasis was missed by cholecystocholangiography in at least two patients. Cystic duct cholangiography is clearly the optimal technique. In situations of unclear anatomy in which safe dissection of the cystic duct is not possible, cholecystocholangiography remains a useful alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic

€34.99 /Month

Subscribe now Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. References
  1. Berci G, Sackier JM (1991) The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 382–384

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brodish RJ, Fing AS (1992) Cholangiography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the SAGES opinion. Surg Endosc 6: 91

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calame A, Montant R (1954) La cholangiographie laparoscopique. Helv Chir Acta 21: 438–440

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H (1989) Cholecystectomie par coelioscopie. Presse Med 18: 980–982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography: an update. Surg Endosc 6: 99

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klaiber C, Metzger A (1992) Manual der laparoskopischen Chirurgie. Huber Verlag, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  8. Royer M (1952) La colangiografia laparoscopia. El Ateno, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sackier JM, Berci G, Phillips E, Carrol B, Shapiro S, Paz-Partlow M (1991) The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 126: 1021–1026

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. New Engl J Med 324: 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information Authors and Affiliations
  1. Department for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Bern, Inselspital, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland

    A. Glättli, A. Metzger, C. Seiler & H. U. Baer

  2. Department of Surgery, Aarberg Hospital, CH-3270, Aarberg, Switzerland

    C. Klaiber

  3. Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, 5011, Adelaide, Australia

    G. J. Maddern

Authors
  1. A. Glättli
  2. A. Metzger
  3. C. Klaiber
  4. C. Seiler
  5. G. J. Maddern
  6. H. U. Baer
About this article Cite this article

Glättli, A., Metzger, A., Klaiber, C. et al. Cholecystocholangiography vs cystic duct cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 8, 299–301 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00590957

Download citation

Key words

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4