The forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index are common measures to quantify food selection but the values of both indices depend not only on the extent of selection but also on the relative abundances of the food types in the environment. They are therefore useless when food types with different relative abundances are compared, or when the relation between selection and relative abundance is studied. Modified versions of both indices are proposed which are based directly on the rates of decrement (mortality) of the food due to feeding, and are independent of the relative abundance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article Subscribe and saveSpringer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
Price includes VAT (Germany)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. ReferencesEdmondson, W. T., Winberg, G. G. (eds.): A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters. IBP Handbook No. 17. Oxford: Blackwell 1971
Ivlev, V. S.: Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press 1961
Zoologisches Institut der Universität München, München, Federal Republic of Germany
Jürgen Jacobs
Jacobs, J. Quantitative measurement of food selection. Oecologia 14, 413–417 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384581
Received: 16 January 1974
Issue Date: December 1974
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384581
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4