A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-024-03610-0 below:

Intelligent Ureteral Stent Placeable via Standard Procedure for Kidney Pressure Telemetry: An Ex-Vivo Study

References

  1. Stamatelou, K., and D. S. Goldfarb. Epidemiology of kidney stones. Healthcare (Basel). 11:424, 2023.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moftakhar, L., F. Jafari, M. Ghoddusi Johari, R. Rezaeianzadeh, S. V. Hosseini, and A. Rezaianzadeh. Prevalence and risk factors of kidney stone disease in population aged 40–70 years old in Kharameh cohort study: a cross-sectional population-based study in southern Iran. BMC Urology. 22:205, 2022.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ordonez, M., E. C. Hwang, M. Borofsky, C. J. Bakker, S. Gandhi, and P. Dahm. Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012703.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomer, N., E. Garden, A. Small, and M. Palese. Ureteral stent encrustation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, management and current technology. The Journal of Urology. 205:68–77, 2021.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yachia, D. Learning from our mistakes: applying vascular stent technologies to the urinary tract. In: Urinary stents, edited by F. Soria, D. Rako, and P. de Graaf. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, W., X. Gao, J. Chen, Z. Liu, L. Peng, and X. Wei. Metal stent for the ureteral stricture after surgery and/or radiation treatment for malignancy. BMC Urology. 21:146, 2021.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Widyokirono, D. R., Y. P. Kloping, Z. A. Rahman, and L. Hakim. Outcomes of ureteral stent placement for hydronephrosis in patients with ureteral stone. Universa Medicina. 40:126–131, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Artiles Medina, A., I. Laso García, F. González Tello, S. Álvarez Rodríguez, M. Hevia Palacios, M. Mata Alcaraz, C. Mínguez Ojeda, F. Arias Funez, V. G. Dos Santos, and F. J. Burgos Revilla. The challenging management of malignant ureteral obstruction: analysis of a series of 188 cases. Current Urology. 18:34–42, 2023.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nathan, A., M. Morris, M. G. Parry, B. Berry, A. Sujenthiran, J. Nossiter, H. Payne, J. Van Der Meulen, N. W. Clarke, and J. S. A. Green. Interventions for obstructive uropathy in advanced prostate cancer: a population-based study. BJU International. 130:688–695, 2022.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Can, U., M. Tuncer, F. Narter, K. Sabuncu, and K. Sarıca. Ureteral stent insertion in pregnants with intractable flank pain: a clinical experience. South Clin Ist Euras. 29:285–289, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vaidyanathan, S., F. Selmi, K. A. Abraham, P. Hughes, G. Singh, and B. Soni. Hydronephrosis and renal failure following inadequate management of neuropathic bladder in a patient with spinal cord injury: case report of a preventable complication. Patient Safety in Surgery. 6:22, 2012.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lam, N. K., A. C. Berent, C. W. Weisse, C. Bryan, A. J. Mackin, and D. H. Bagley. Endoscopic placement of ureteral stents for treatment of congenital bilateral ureteral stenosis in a dog. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 240:983–990, 2012.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Borghese, G., D. Raimondo, E. D. Esposti, A. C. Aru, A. Raffone, B. Orsini, M. Ambrosio, R. Iodice, J. Lenzi, S. Del Forno, P. Casadio, and R. Seracchioli. Preoperative ureteral stenting in women with deep posterior endometriosis and ureteral involvement: is it useful? International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 158:179–186, 2022.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weingertner, A. S., B. Rodriguez, A. Ziane, E. Gibon, V. Thoma, F. Osario, C. Haddad, and A. Wattiez. The use of JJ stent in the management of deep endometriosis lesion, affecting or potentially affecting the ureter: a review of our practice. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 115:1159–1164, 2008.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mutou, T., S. Kira, R. Furuya, T. Mochiduki, N. Sawada, and T. Mitsui. A case of proximal migration of a double-J ureteral stent in a patient with metastatic gastric cancer. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2023:rjad488, 2023.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ando, T., and A. Kazama. Double J stent migration as renal penetration. Urology Case Reports.39:101759, 2021.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim, K. S., Z. W. Law, M. W. L. Chow, A. S. P. Sim, and H. S. S. Ho. Peak stent discomfort occurs early and ureteral stent with distal loop design has less pain—a pilot prospective randomised single-blinded trial over 2 weeks. Asian Journal of Urology. 7:357–362, 2020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Geavlete, P., D. Georgescu, R. Mulțescu, F. Stanescu, C. Cozma, and B. Geavlete. Ureteral stent complications—experience on 50,000 procedures. Journal of Medicine and Life. 14:769–775, 2021.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lombardo, R., A. Tubaro, and C. De Nunzio. Ureteral stent encrustation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, management and current technology. Journal of Urology. 207:68–77, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mosayyebi, A., C. Manes, D. Carugo, and B. K. Somani. Advances in ureteral stent design and materials. Current Urology Reports. 19:35, 2018.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bargues-Balanzá, M., G. Ordaz-Jurado, A. Budía-Alba, and F. Boronat-Tormo. Ureteral stents. Impact on patient’s quality of life. In: Urinary stents current state and future perspectives, edited by F. Soria, D. Rako, and P. de Graaf. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Domingues, B., M. Pacheco, J. E. de la Cruz, I. Carmagnola, R. Teixeira-Santos, M. Laurenti, F. Can, K. Bohinc, F. Moutinho, J. M. Silva, I. M. Aroso, E. Lima, R. L. Reis, G. Ciardelli, V. Cauda, F. J. Mergulhão, F. S. Gálvez, and A. A. Barros. Future directions for ureteral stent technology: from bench to the market. Advanced Therapeutics. 5:2100158, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khoddami, S., B. H. Chew, and D. Lange. Problems and solutions of stent biofilm and encrustations: a review of literature. Turkish Journal of Urology. 46:S11–S18, 2020.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gobishangar, S., and J. Shelton. Minimally invasive management of massive giant hydronephrosis in tertiary care centre northern Sri Lanka: a case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.88:106514, 2021.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vishnu, J., and G. Manivasagam. Perspectives on smart stents with sensors: from conventional permanent to novel bioabsorbable smart stent technologies. Medical Devices & Sensors.3:e10116, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nuraj, P., and N. Hyseni. The diagnosis of obstructive hydronephrosis with color doppler ultrasound. Acta Informatica Medica. 25:178–181, 2017.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Leo, M. M., B. K. Langlois, J. R. Pare, P. Mitchell, J. Linden, and K. P. Nelson. Ultrasound vs. computed tomography for severity of hydronephrosis and its importance in renal colic. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 18:559–568, 2017.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Łoń, I., M. Wieliczko, J. Lewandowski, and J. Małyszko. Retroperitoneal fibrosis is still an underdiagnosed entity with poor prognosis. Kidney & Blood Pressure Research. 47:151–162, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cai, Y., X. Li, B. Zhu, R. Chen, C. Ye, Y. Wang, Y. Tao, Q. Sun, and X. Wen. A practical pressure measuring method for the upper urinary tract during ureteroscopy. Clinical and Investigative Medicine. 35:322–326, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wåhlin, N., A. Magnusson, A. E. Persson, G. Läckgren, and A. Stenberg. Pressure flow measurement of hydronephrosis in children: a new approach to definition and quantification of obstruction. The Journal of Urology. 166:1842–1847, 2001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun, L., D. Zhao, L. Zhu, Y. Shen, Y. Zhao, and D. Tang. Asymptomatic obstructive hydronephrosis associated with diabetes insipidus: a case report and review. Translational Pediatrics. 10:1721–1727, 2021.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Blaheta, R. A., A. Oertl, H. J. Freisleben, K. Nelson, H. Ackermann, A. Haferkamp, and T. Engl. Detection of early DJ-stent encrustation by sonographic twinkling-artifacts—a pilot study. Central European Journal of Urology. 70:107–111, 2017.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yousefi Darestani, M. R., N. Shalabi, D. Lange, B. H. Chew, and K. Takahata. Intelligent ureteral stent for early detection of hydronephrosis. Advanced Materials Technologies. 6:2100652, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yousefi Darestani, M. R., D. Lange, B. H. Chew, and K. Takahata. Electromechanically functionalized ureteral stents for wireless obstruction monitoring. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 9:4392–4403, 2023.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Behfar, M. H., L. Sydanheimo, S. Roy, and L. Ukkonen. Dual-port planar antenna for implantable inductively coupled sensors. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 65:5732–5739, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nelson, B. D., S. S. Karipott, Y. Wang, and K. G. Ong. Wireless technologies for implantable devices. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 20:4604, 2020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, X., D. Brox, B. Assadsangabi, Y. Hsiang, and K. Takahata. Intelligent telemetric stent for wireless monitoring of intravascular pressure and its in vivo testing. Biomedical Microdevices. 16:745–759, 2014.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Khan, S. R., S. K. Pavuluri, G. Cummins, and M. P. Y. Desmulliez. Wireless power transfer techniques for implantable medical devices: a review. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 20:3487, 2020.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Benken, A., and Y. Gianchandani. Passive wireless pressure sensing for gastric manometry. Micromachines. 10:868, 2019.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Fischer, K. M., M. Louie, and P. Mucksavage. Ureteral stent discomfort and its management. Current Urology Reports. 19:64, 2018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Al-Aown, A., I. Kyriazis, P. Kallidonis, P. Kraniotis, C. Rigopoulos, D. Karnabatidis, T. Petsas, and E. Liatsikos. Ureteral stents: new ideas, new designs. Therapeutic Advances in Urology. 2:85–92, 2010.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Chevalier, Jr., Raymond P. (Bloomington, IN), Ernster; Christopher J. (Charlestown M. Ureteral stents, drainage tubes and the like. 1995.

  43. Behfar MH, Moradi E, Björninen T, Sydänheimo L, Ukkonen L. Design and technical evaluation of an implantable passive sensor for minimally invasive wireless intracranial pressure monitoring. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, June 7–12, 2015, Toronto, Canada 1301–1304, 2015.

  44. Kaisti, M., T. Panula, J. Leppänen, R. Punkkinen, M. Jafari Tadi, T. Vasankari, S. Jaakkola, T. Kiviniemi, J. Airaksinen, P. Kostiainen, U. Meriheinä, T. Koivisto, and M. Pänkäälä. Clinical assessment of a non-invasive wearable MEMS pressure sensor array for monitoring of arterial pulse waveform, heart rate and detection of atrial fibrillation. npj Digital Medicine. 2:39, 2019.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kaisti, M., J. Leppänen, O. Lahdenoja, P. Kostiainen, M. Pänkäälä, U. Meriheinä, and T. Koivisto. Wearable pressure sensor array for health monitoring. Computing in Cardiology. 44:1–4, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mahmood, A. I., S. K. Gharghan, M. A. Eldosoky, and A. M. Soliman. Near-field wireless power transfer used in biomedical implants: a comprehensive review. IET Power Electronics. 15:1936–1955, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hassler, C., T. Boretius, and T. Stieglitz. Polymers for neural implants. Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polymer Physics. 49:18–33, 2011.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Correia, R., J. Deuermeier, M. R. Correia, J. Vaz Pinto, J. Coelho, E. Fortunato, and R. Martins. Biocompatible parylene-C laser-induced graphene electrodes for microsupercapacitor applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 14:46427–46438, 2022.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lee, D., S. Kim, D. W. Sohn, B. Choi, M. Lee, S. Lee, and S. Kim. Biocompatibility of parylene-C as a coating material of implantable bladder volume sensor. Korean Journal of Andrology. 28:175–183, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kim, S. J., D. S. Lee, I. G. Kim, D. W. Sohn, J. Y. Park, B. K. Choi, and S. W. Kim. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a coating material for an implantable bladder volume sensor. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 28:123–129, 2012.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Brooks, T., and C. W. Keevil. A simple artificial urine for the growth of urinary pathogens. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 24:203–206, 1997.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fazil Marickar, Y. M. Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids in urine. Urological Research. 38:233–235, 2010.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Musa, M. J., and A. Abukonna. Sonographic measurement of renal size in normal high altitude populations. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 10:178–182, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zheng, S., D. Carugo, A. Mosayyebi, B. Turney, F. Burkhard, D. Lange, D. Obrist, S. Waters, and F. Clavica. Fluid mechanical modeling of the upper urinary tract. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Mechanisms of Disease.13:e1523, 2021.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Smit, J. H. A., E. P. Leonardi, R. H. de Figueiredo Chaves, I. P. Furlaneto, C. M. S. da Silva, S. de Campos Vieira Abib, and A. M. de Oliveira Góes Junior. Image-guided study of swine anatomy as a tool for urologic surgery research and training1. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 35:351208, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zlatev, H., C. von Horn, and T. Minor. Preservation of mitochondrial coupling and renal function by controlled oxygenated rewarming of porcine kidney grafts. Biomolecules. 11:1880, 2021.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Yang, C., C. U. B. Wijerathne, G. W. Tu, C. W. H. Woo, Y. L. Siow, S. Madduma Hewage, K. K. W. Au-Yeung, T. Zhu, and O. Karmin. Ischemia-reperfusion injury reduces kidney folate transporter expression and plasma folate levels. Frontiers in Immunology.12:678914, 2021.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Brewer, A. V., A. M. Elbahnasy, E. Bercowsky, K. L. Maxwell, A. L. Shalhav, S. A. Kahn, E. M. McDougall, and R. V. Clayman. Mechanism of ureteral stent flow: a comparative in vivo study. Journal of Endourology. 13:269–271, 1999.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Shalabi, N., K. Searles, and K. Takahata. Switch mode capacitive pressure sensors. Microsystems and Nanoengineering. 8:132, 2022.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Brox, D. S., X. Chen, S. Mirabbasi, and K. Takahata. Wireless telemetry of stainless-steel-based smart antenna stent using a transient resonance method. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters. 15:754–757, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yi, Y., J. Chen, M. Selvaraj, Y. Hsiang, and K. Takahata. Wireless hyperthermia stent system for restenosis treatment and testing with swine model. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 67:1097–1104, 2020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4