A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-009-9820-0 below:

Distinguishing Separate Components in High-dimensional Signals by Using the Modified Embedding Method and Forecasting

Abstract

The non-linear analysis of medium- and high-dimensional signals (HDS) encounters often difficulties due to the problem of the choice of the proper window width. This problem occurs due to the fact that the autocorrelation time (τ) of HDS reflecting the natural scale of the signal is similar or higher than the predictability of HDS and the predictability points to some degree to the maximal acceptable window width (W). The new approach to the embedding process is proposed in this paper that uses the constant W instead of the constant L. The lag is calculated by using the formula L = W/(m − 1). If L is non-integer, the cubic interpolation is performed to find the values of the signal between the given points. A forecasting analysis of two signals of the known structure and dimensional complexity is performed by employing the new approach. The analyzed signals consist of 3 and 4 Lorenz signals of different time scales, respectively. The used measure of the predictability is the predictive time t p05 that is defined as the prediction time for which the correlation coefficient ρ between the real and the predicted points equals 0.5. The relations t p05(W) possess the maxima that correspond to the autocorrelation times of the individual components. These maxima are observed approximately at W i  = (0.6–1)τ i , where i is the index of the given component of the signal. The saturation of predictability is observed for consecutive maxima in most cases at the embedding dimension equal to about \( m_{i}^{*} \) = 2 · d k + 1, where d k is the sum of the dimensional complexities of the components, whose autocorrelation time is equal or less than the W i . Thus, it is clearly visible that only the components of the time scale equal or less than W i are demonstrated in the results of the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic

€34.99 /Month

Subscribe now Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. References
  1. Blinowska, K. J., and M. Malinowski. Non-linear and linear forecasting of the EEG time series. Biol. Cybern. 66:159–165, 1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Casdagli, M. Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series. Physica D 35:335–356, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farmer, J. D., and J. J. Sidorovich. Predicting chaotic time series. Phys. Lett. 59(8):845–848, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia, S. P., and J. S. Almeida. Multivariate phase space reconstruction by nearest neighbor embedding with different time delays. Phys. Rev. E 72:027205-1–027205-4, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hernandez, J. L., J. L. Valdez, R. Biscay, J. C. Jimenez, and P. Valdez. EEG predictability: adequacy of non-linear forecasting methods. Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 38:197–206, 1995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kennel, M. B., and S. Isabelle. Method to distinguish chaos from colored noise to determine embedding parameters. Phys. Rev. A 46(6):3111–3118, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Michalak, K. P., and P. Jaskowski. Predictability of posturographic signals: influence of the window width and embedding dimension. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 27(4):71–83, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pritchard, D., and D. W. Duke. Measuring chaos in the brain: a tutorial review of nonlinear dynamical EEG analysis. Int. J. Neurosci. 67:31–80, 1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rapp, P. E. A guide to dynamical analysis. Integr. Physiol. Behav. Sci. 29(3):311–327, 1994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rapp, P. E., A. M. Albano, T. I. Schmah, and L. A. Farwell. Filtered noise can mimic low-dimensional chaotic attractors. Phys. Rev. E 47(4):2289–2297, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rapp, P. E., A. M. Albano, I. D. Zimmerman, and M. A. Jimenez-Montano. Phase-randomized surrogates can produce spurious identifications of non-random structure. Phys. Lett. A 192:27–33, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, R. L. Optimal estimation of fractal dimension. In: Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting. Vol. XII of SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1992, pp. 115–136.

  13. Sugihara, G., and R. M. May. Nonlinear forecasting as way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series. Nature 344:734–741, 1990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Theiler, J. Some comments on the correlation dimension of 1/falfa noise. Phys. Lett. A 155:480–493, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsonis, A. A., and J. B. Elsner. Nonlinear prediction as way of distinguishing chaos from random fractal sequences. Nature 358:217–220, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verdes, P. F., P. M. Granitto, and H. A. Ceccatto. An overembedding method for modeling nonstationary systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 24(96):1–4, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wales, D. J. Calculating the rate of loss of information from chaotic time series by forecasting. Lett. Nat. 350:485–488, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Watters, P. A. Selecting parameters for phase space reconstruction of the electrocorticogram (ECoG). J. Integr. Neurosci. 4(2):169–182, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information Authors and Affiliations
  1. Department of Biophysics, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Fredry Str. 10, 61-701, Poznan, Poland

    Krzysztof Piotr Michalak

Authors
  1. Krzysztof Piotr Michalak
Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Piotr Michalak.

About this article Cite this article

Michalak, K.P. Distinguishing Separate Components in High-dimensional Signals by Using the Modified Embedding Method and Forecasting. Ann Biomed Eng 38, 200–207 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9820-0

Download citation

Keywords

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4