A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://librepathology.org/wiki/Basics below:

Basics - Libre Pathology

This article serves as an introduction to anatomical pathology and discusses the basics.

Pathology simplified Blue & pink

H&E is the standard...

In words:

Note:

Three questions

Pathology can be boiled down to:

  1. What is it?
  2. Did I get it all?
  3. Did I get the right thing?
Terms Staining Morphologic patterns

This covers things like cribriform, hobnail, herring bone and many others.

Nuclear destruction words

There are several fancy terms:[5]

Image:

Erosions and ulcers

Image:

Microscopic - erosion

Features - require 1 and 2:

  1. Loss of epithelium.
  2. Vital response at site of lost epithelium.

Image:

The general differential diagnosis

Mnemonic CINE-TV-DATE:

In diagnostic pathology, most stuff falls into the neoplastic category.

Features of malignancy Cytologic features of malignancy

It is said that:[7]

  1. It is the nuclear abnormalities that make a cell malignant.
  2. The cytoplasm that gives one clues as to the cell of origin.

Nuclear features and malignancy:[7]

Feature Strength in predicting malignancy? Large nuclear size weak Nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio strong Nuclear pleomorphism weak Nucleoli shape (angulated, spiked, complex) strong Nucleoli size weak - generally; strong if like in a RS cell High nucleoli number weak negative; finding favours benign Chromatin hyperchromasia weak Chromatin granularity strong Nuclear membrane irregularities strong (clefting, flat edges, sharp angles),
scalloped (suggests benign) Mitoses weak § Atypical mitoses strong

§ mitoses are seen in poorly differentiated tumour and regeneration. High mitotic rate in the context of unremarkable nuclear morphology is usually not malignant.

Other features

In the context of soft tissue lesions, it is said that the two most important features of malignancy are:

  1. Necrosis.
  2. High vascularity.

Notes:

General differential diagnosis of malignant lesion

This should always be considered:

Q. Why?
A. (1) The site of the tumour can considerably change the differential diagnosis. (2) The management is usually totally different.

A general clinico-histomorphologically motivated differential diagnosis of malignancy

Notes:

Memory device HMN GEM: hematologic, melanoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, germ cell, epithelial, mesenchymal.

Morphologic categorization Factors to consider

Factors to consider when attempting to group by morphology:

  1. Cell shape (spindle cell, epithelioid, plasmacytoid, mixed).
  2. Cell size (small or large) - size in relation to a neutrophil or red blood cell.
  3. Cell cohesion - dyscohesive vs. cohesive.
  4. Cytoplasm - abundance (scant, moderate, abundant).
  5. Chromatin - coarseness (fine, granular).
  6. Nucleoli - number (absent, present, multiple).
Types of cells Type Morphology Significance Spindle cell tapered at both ends[8] suggestive of sarcoma - compatible with melanoma and some carcinomas Epithelioid cell cell shape round/oval, nucleus round/oval, looks like epithelium (cell borders touch neighbouring cells - collectively form a barrier) suggests epithelial lesion (carcinoma) - compatible with others Small round blue cell tumour/lymphoid: small cells with scant cytoplasm - usually round; "small" is classically 2x a "resting lymphocyte" diameter † common in children; in adults often lymphoma Small lymphoid (small cell lymphoma). "small" in the context of lymphoid is classically ~1x a "resting lymphocyte" diameter; often not malignant by cytology suggests small cell lymphoma, reactive changes or infection Plasmacytoid cell resemble a plasma cell: eccentric nucleus, moderate basophilic cytoplasm, +/-"clockface" chromatin pattern (clumping of chromatin at the periphery of the nucleus), +/-perinuclear hof (crescentic cytoplasmic clearing adjacent to the nucleus; represents abundant Golgi apparatus suggests plasma cell neoplasm or infection

Note:

Dyscohesive versus cohesive

Deciding cells are dyscohesive vs. cohesive is important, as it is a strong determinant of whether one is dealing with a lymphoid lesion or not.

Cell spacing Cell membrane Cytoplasm, abundance Cytoplasm, staining Cohesive equal spacing or 3-D clusters or intracellular bridges visible & opposed (in >50% of cells) scant to abundant any Dyscohesive unequal spacing, thin space surrounds cell not apparent usually scant usually basophilic Value/utility equal or 3-D clusters suggests cohesive, pericellular space/rim suggests dyscohesive visible opposed membrane r/i cohesive abundant usu. cohesive eosinophilic usu. cohesive

Strong predictors of cohesive:

Weak predictors of cohesive:

Weak predictors of dyscohesive:

Probable category by morphology A practical histomorphologic differential diagnosis of malignancy General morphologic DDx of malignancy Modified general morphologic DDx of malignancy

The above is more useful than the general clinico-histomorphologically motivated differential diagnosis of malignancy.

Differential diagnosis by site

It is essential to have a concept of what is common. The short power list gives a short differential diagnosis for the common sites.

The long power list is a longer list for the common sites.

Finding the elements Mitoses

DDx:

Images

www:

Phases of mitosis Neutrophils

Main article:

Neutrophils

DDx of little specs:

Notes:

Lymph node metastasis

See: Lymph node article for a detailed description of cell types in a lymph node.

Signet ring cell carcinoma

Microscopic:

DDx:

Stains:

Images

www:

Necrosis

Features:

DDx of necrosis:

Images (necrosis):

Granulomas Common morphologic problems DDx of pink stuff (on H&E)

The ABCs of pink:

Images Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) vs. fibrous tissue

Fibroblasts (fibrous tissue):

SMCs:

Remembering the above:

Notes:

Pigmented material

DDx of granular stuff/pigment:

  1. Lipofuscin - especially in old people.
  2. Hemosiderin.
  3. Bile - found in hepatocytes, yellow.
  4. Foreign material (tattoo pigment, anthracotic pigment, amalgam tattoo).
  5. Melanin.

Notes:

Stains that can help sort it out Staining

Basic knowledge of stain is important. The above article starts with H&E and goes from there.

Immunohistochemistry

If the special stains don't help... there is immunohistochemistry.

Food and pathology Tumour remaining

R classification:[14]

Surgeons use this terminology. Essentially, it is the margin status. It is nice when the surgeon's assessment and the pathologist's are in agreement.

Note:

Clinician talk Performance status

ECOG score:

Pathology & pathologists Fixation & lifestyle

Pathologist have a great lifestyle 'cause tissue takes long to fix; the penetration of tissue by formalin is 1 mm/hour.[17]

Malignancy & inflammation

If there is lots of inflammation... and you're thinking cancer you should probably back-off, i.e. tend toward benign. Inflammation can make cells look more malignant than they might be if left alone.

Miscellaneous Infectious stuffs

Main article:

Microorganisms

Images: http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/bugdrug/antibiotic_manual/Gram3.htm

Microscopes

HPF generally refers to the area seen with the largest magnification objective (40x), i.e. the field at 400x (as the eye piece magnification is usually 10x). The field size varies significantly from microscope to microscope.

Estimating field of view

FOV = Deye piece x 1/Mobj.

Where:

Example:

Applying the formula:

Note:

Pathology reports

The key point in report writing is that the report should be precise, complete and easy-to-understand.

Standards

There is no universal standard; however, there is a push to standardize by the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology,[18] among others.

Checklists

Main article:

CAP checklists

The College of American Pathologists (CAP) has checklists for cancer - CAP protocols.

Pathologists will probably use more checklists in the future... they are deemed effective in a number of places inside and outside of medicine. Surgeons know that checklists work and that they save lives.[19] Pilots have been using checklists since the 1930s.

Standard diagnostic notation

Site, operation/procedure:
- Tissue type diagnosis.


Example:
Gallbladder, cholecystectomy:
- Acute cholecystitis.

Lab talk

Tissue cutting terms - these often vary from lab-to-lab:[20]

See also References
  1. Streutker, C. 8 June 2013.
  2. URL:http://pancreaticcancer2000.com/page1.htm. Accessed on: 3 June 2010.
  3. URL: http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/argyrophilic. Accessed on: 29 August 2011.
  4. URL: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/argyrophilic. Accessed on: 29 August 2011.
  5. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/51/Nuclear_changes.jpg
  6. Arashiro, RT.; Teixeira, MG.; Rawet, V.; Quintanilha, AG.; Paula, HM.; Silva, AZ.; Nahas, SC.; Cecconello, I. (Jul 2012). "Histopathological evaluation and risk factors related to the development of pouchitis in patients with ileal pouches for ulcerative colitis.". Clinics (Sao Paulo) 67 (7): 705-10. PMC 3400158. PMID 22892912. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400158/.
  7. 7.0 7.1 S. Boerner. 12 September 2011.
  8. URL: http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=25657. Accessed on: 18 January 2010.
  9. URL: http://www.microbehunter.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/lily_prophase.jpg and http://www.microbehunter.com/2009/12/06/mitosis-stages-of-the-lily/. Accessed on: 3 November 2010.
  10. URL: http://moon.ouhsc.edu/kfung/jty1/Com08/Com801-1-Diss.htm. Accessed on: 3 November 2010.
  11. Mitchell, Richard; Kumar, Vinay; Fausto, Nelson; Abbas, Abul K.; Aster, Jon (2011). Pocket Companion to Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease (8th ed.). Elsevier Saunders. pp. 20. ISBN 978-1416054542.
  12. URL: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gentisic+acid. Accessed on: 11 January 2012.
  13. Kovi J, Leifer C (July 1970). "Lipofuscin pigment accumulation in spontaneous mammary carcinoma of A/Jax mouse". J Natl Med Assoc 62 (4): 287–90. PMC 2611776. PMID 5463681. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2611776/pdf/jnma00512-0077.pdf.
  14. URL: http://www.informedicalcme.com/colon-cancer/tnm-stage-groupings/. Accessed on: 27 March 2012.
  15. Larsen SG, Wiig JN, Dueland S, Giercksky KE (April 2008). "Prognostic factors after preoperative irradiation and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer". Eur J Surg Oncol 34 (4): 410–7. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.05.012. PMID 17614249.
  16. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. (December 1982). "Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group". Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 5 (6): 649–55. PMID 7165009.
  17. Gross rounds. 14 August 2009.
  18. URL: http://www.adasp.org/papers/position/Standardization.htm
  19. Soar J, Peyton J, Leonard M, Pullyblank AM (2009). "Surgical safety checklists". BMJ 338: b220. PMID 19158173. http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19158173.
  20. URL: http://www.mailman.srv.ualberta.ca/pipermail/patho-l/2002-July/016955.html. Accessed on: 18 October 2011.
External links

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4