Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to chromium-dev
We’re back to 32-bit today, but yesterday’s Mac canary (33.0.1702.2) was quietly released as 64-bit to help shake out any problems with the 64-bit Mac build, as we move closer to releasing it more widely.
So far, we’ve noticed two problems:
Another known limitation is that the 64-bit browser will not load 32-bit plug-ins. We’re evaluating whether it needs to. On the other hand, the 64-bit browser is able to load 64-bit plug-ins that the 32-bit browser could not, such as the Java 7 plug-in.
If you have any additional feedback about yesterday’s canary, please let me know. After evaluating all of the feedback, I plan to release 64-bit builds to the canary channel somewhat more regularly.
If you’re interested in using the 64-bit build in your own development, set the target_arch and host_arch GYP variables both to “x64” and run “gclient runhooks”. You can do this by setting the GYP_DEFINES environment variable to "target_arch=x64 host_arch=x64".
Mark
Mark Seaborn unread, Nov 8, 2013, 8:55:56 PM11/8/13 Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Mark Mentovai, chromium-dev, dsc...@chromium.org, Jan Voung
Mark Mentovai unread, Nov 8, 2013, 9:09:21 PM11/8/13 Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Mark Seaborn, chromium-dev, dsc...@chromium.org, Jan Voung
Jan Voung unread, Nov 8, 2013, 11:09:04 PM11/8/13 Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Mark Mentovai, Mark Seaborn, chromium-dev, dsc...@chromium.org
Derek Schuff unread, Nov 8, 2013, 11:09:59 PM11/8/13 Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Jan Voung, Mark Mentovai, Mark Seaborn, chromium-dev
Mark Mentovai unread, Nov 8, 2013, 11:25:08 PM11/8/13 Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Derek Schuff, Jan Voung, Mark Seaborn, chromium-dev
Thanks. I hung the newly-filed
http://crbug.com/316916off of these as dependencies. It’s tracking bug to tie up everything that we learned from this initial canary, so that we can make sure we have an answer for the known issues before trying again.
Jan Voung unread, Nov 9, 2013, 1:22:58 AM11/9/13 Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Mark Mentovai, asar...@chromium.org, Derek Schuff, Mark Seaborn, chromium-dev
+cc asargent
Oh one other worry was Multi-CRX extensions with "_platform_specific/" directories. Do they get re-installed too?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3