We have two external entities we refer to: Assets and Parties.
For Assets, we now have the inverse property hasPolicy for target.
(so an Asset, in the wild, can assert a relationship to an ODRL Policy)
Should we consider also the same for Parties?
That is:
:assigneeTo owl:inverseOf :assignee ;
:assignerTo owl:inverseOf :assigner ;
Then, a party can assert they are the assignee/assigner to a Policy.
This may be useful for "instant licenses" so an party can say:
:billie odrl:assigneeTo :policy100
Thoughts?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3