If I am not mistaken, mix() is valid for custom properties, whose initial value is the guaranteed-invalid value, ie. an omitted value.
A
mix()notation is invalid if either of its<declaration-value>s are invalid when interpreted as a whole value for the property the function is used in, or if the property using it is not animatable.
Should mix() syntax allow omitting <declaration-value> ...
- <mix()> = mix( <percentage> ';' <declaration-value> ';' <declaration-value> ) + <mix()> = mix( <percentage> ';' <declaration-value>? ';' <declaration-value>? )
... to accept inputs like --custom: mix(50%; ; on)?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3