Chrome implemented conic-gradient() last year behind a flag and now wants to ship. Some internal teams have expressed interest in using conic-gradient on consumer products, and they would rather see the feature shipped than provide back-doors.
I checked and there are no open issues about conic-gradient here. Chrome's implementation has also been tested a fair bit by authors creating demos and beyond a few rendering quality issues with the GPU backend, there are no outstanding problems.
Spec-wise, conic-gradient has been in some Images draft for five years or so.
I think it makes sense to clear this for shipping, and is certainly better than the alternative.
Adding this to the agenda so we can discuss this Wednesday.
thatkookooguy, pataruco, jpidelatorre and Sunit41557077
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4