The flexbox specs and alignment specs both have instructions about the fallback behavior of justify-content: space-between, and they contradict each other.
The flexbox spec says it falls back to 'flex-start':
If...there is only a single flex item on the line, this value is identical to 'flex-start'.
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#valdef-justify-content-space-between
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#valdef-align-content-space-between
Whereas the align spec says it falls back to 'start':
The default fallback alignment for this value is 'start'.
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#valdef-align-content-space-between
Note that 'start' and 'flex-start' sound similar but are subtly different in a flexbox context, so the distinction is important.
Could these specs be clarified to be non-contradictory on this point?
(I think the flexbox spec just needs an update.... I guess flexbox doesn't know about 'start' and 'end' keywords and the other "new" things in the css-align spec, so maybe it's tricky to reference those from flexbox. Still: the current text that I quoted above ["this value is identical to 'flex-start'"] is clearly incorrect & problematic, if the align spec is really authoritative on this point.)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3