Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1432 below:

[css-align] Rules for align/justify-self on static position of absolutely-positioned boxes need more detail · Issue #1432 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub

The alignment spec has rules for applying justify-self to the static position of absolutely-positioned boxes and similar for align-self. This section is quite opaque, and could perhaps use an introduction.

I think what this section is trying to say is that for absolutely positioned elements that use their static position, they're aligned within their static-position rectangle (formerly "hypothetical box") using the align-self and justify-self properties. If that's the idea, it would be nice to have a little bit of prose saying that, and explaining the relationship to the previous section.

But there are also a number of other issues:

• unlike the two sections (for blocks and absolutely-positioned elements) preceding each of these sections, they don't specify any rules about overriding the rules for over-constrained situations, and therefore if the intent is as described above, I think it doesn't actually work
• I don't understand what " The box’s margin box after laying out the box, treated as fixed-size for the purpose of alignment." means
• I don't understand what "(as the fallback for stretch for fixed-size boxes)" means.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.5