associationlist and related roles have tediously long names. These look like ObjC naming conventions: associationlist:item:value: ;-)
associationlist: A section containing associationlistitemkey and associationlistitemvalue elements.
associationlistitemkey: A single key item in an association list.
associationlistitemvalue: A single value item in an association list.
I don't have a particular preference other than "not what's there" but in the interest of forwarding the discussion, I'd suggest the following:
associationlist entirely. I don't think there needs to be any distinction between list and associationlist in the Accessibility APIs.listitemkey and listitemvalue may be sufficient. It's possible listitemvalue could be an alias of listitem… I'm not certain, but the existence of a key may be all that's needed to distinguish between standard lists (~html:ol/html:ul) and these (~html:dl)You can’t perform that action at this time.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3