A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://github.com/unum-cloud/ustore/discussions/228 below:

Will ukv ever have support for queues? · unum-cloud/ustore · Discussion #228 · GitHub

Skip to content Navigation Menu Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Saved searches Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. Dismiss alert Will ukv ever have support for queues? #228

Jan 9, 2023 · 2 comments · 1 reply

-

I am looking ukv as an alternative for redis. Today redis support queues also. ukv in general great for addressing different modalities. It would be good to add queues also.

Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

You must be logged in to vote

Potentially, yes. However, series and queues are dissimilar in their writing patterns. The first is append-only, and the latter is first-in-first-out. The best structure for a queue is a ring buffer, not a key-value store. It can be added for compatibility, but it may not be the best idea right away.

Let's keep this conversation open and see if there is more demand for this to be prioritized.

-

Potentially, yes. However, series and queues are dissimilar in their writing patterns. The first is append-only, and the latter is first-in-first-out. The best structure for a queue is a ring buffer, not a key-value store. It can be added for compatibility, but it may not be the best idea right away.

Let's keep this conversation open and see if there is more demand for this to be prioritized.

Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

You must be logged in to vote

0 replies

-

Thanks for the reply. I hope at some point ukv will be a contender to replace redis. Today's key/value market share is dominent by redis. Some of other projects like kvrocks, tidis offer redis compatibility. It would be nice to have an ability to add redis as a compatibility layer. This way we can use existing redis libraries for and without coding chnages we can start using ukv.

Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

You must be logged in to vote

1 reply

-

I think a Redis and Postgres compatibility can be implemented as a separate repo, using UKV under the hood. That would be a better path to compatibility, than fitting everything here.

Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Heading

Bold

Italic

Quote

Code

Link

Numbered list

Unordered list

Task list

Attach files

Mention

Reference

Menu reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji

You can’t perform that action at this time.


RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4