I really love this proposal and I want it to be implemented but... I believe that the question mark is not a good choice. We already have the existing ternary operator and probably later we'll have the implementation of the 2 proposals optional chaining and nullish coalescing. Obviously, the futur js code will looks like very ugly hieroglyphs.
Why not an asterisk or another special character ?
const add = (x, y) => x + y; const mul = (x, y) => x * y; 10 |> add(1, *) |> mul(*, 2)
It's just my personal opinion but maybe it's just me.
Too much question marks...
saschanaz, haltcase, flying-sheep, JacopKane, Haroenv and 20 morelazarljubenovic, theres and mikestopcontinues
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4