The bar for changes to the proposal is now high, but there are some changes that are either already part of the proposal spec or are planned. I will bring these up for consensus at the July TC39 meeting.
[no LineTerminator here]
restriction before with
. This was necessary with assert
to avoid ASI ambiguities, but given that with
is a reserved word we don't have this problem anymore. I noticed this wile implementing the proposal in Babel, and it has also been reported at No need for NLTH with with
keyword #136.LiteralPropertyName
in import attributes keys, making with { 0: "a", 1n: "b" }
syntactically valid. This is for consistency with objects, and thus with the dynamic import form. ( Normative: Add Import Attributes ecma262#3057 (review))RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4