The reason I originally selected the Unlicense when this project began was to maximize use of the library. However, since then I've come to learn that such a license actually prevents use and contribution by some organizations because Unlicense is not an OSI approved license and is a little risky legally.
I would like to consider changing the licensing to MIT as the best, most open alternative recognized by the broader OSS community. The goal, as always, is to maximize the applicability of the software.
I want to know what you think. Any such license change will affect all stacktrace.js projects, and will be effective as of the next major version, 2.0.
Please use the 👍 and 👎 reactions or discuss below.
rhart, webmink, steren, The-Compiler, oliversalzburg and 2 more
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4