This problem was already reported in bug #1569, but it was auto closed.
Maybe a new name should be found for the function, or it should just not pollute the global scope in some way?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4