RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#2298
Status?
macro repetition #47752)?
as a macro separator and Kleene op in 2018 edition #51934)None.
Unresolved questions to be answered before stabilization?
Kleene operator accept a separator? Adding a separator is completely meaningless (since we don't accept trailing separators, and ? can accept "at most one" repetition), but allowing it is consistent with +
and *
. Currently, we allow a separator. We could also make it an error or lint.ebkalderon, real-felix, H2CO3 and boozookalexreg, mark-i-m, estebank, hcpl, H2CO3 and 1 more
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4