For precise capturing (#123432), we need to decide which syntax to adopt.
The original two, left as an open question in the RFC, were:
impl use<..> Trait
use<..> impl Trait
(See the alternatives section in the RFC for a detailed comparative analysis of these options. In particular, so as to reduce duplication, please read that section carefully before commenting here.)
However, in the design meeting on 2024-06-05, as described below, we settled on placing use<..> within the list of bounds, e.g.:
fn foo<'a>() -> impl Sized + use<'a> {}
This issue is to track the resolution of the open question on syntax left in the RFC.
Tracking:
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4