def default_tax owner.tax.nonzero? end
This code shouldn't suggest renaming the method to defalt_tax?
. Despite its name, nonzero?
is not a predicate; its protocol is "return a number if it isn't zero, or nil
otherwise".
While many might consider it idiosyncratic, it is a Ruby core method, heavily used by some codebases 🤷
Actual behaviorNaming/PredicateMethod: Predicate method names should end with ?.
def default_tax
^^^^^^^^^^^
RuboCop version
$ [bundle exec] rubocop -V
1.77.0 (using Parser 3.3.8.0, Prism 1.4.0, rubocop-ast 1.45.1, analyzing as Ruby 3.3, running on ruby 3.3.8) [x86_64-linux]
- rubocop-rspec 3.6.0
- rubocop-rails 2.32.0
- rubocop-performance 1.25.0
- rubocop-rake 0.7.1
- rubocop-capybara 2.22.1
- rubocop-rspec_rails 2.31.0
- rubocop-factory_bot 2.27.1
- rubocop-graphql 1.1.1
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4