Originally opened by xinzhn
I am wondering if it would be possible to add an additional option (e.g, userDefined
) for the argument effectMeasure
in getSimulationEnrichmentMeans/Rates/Survival
, to allow a user defined function based on effect measures other than effectEstimate
and testStatistic
for selectPopulationsFunction
. Examples for such alternatives are population-specific predictive probabilities and subgroup-specific posterior probabilities1. This might be implemented by providing additional arguments for the customized function selectPopulationsFunction
to facilitate the calculation for both type of probabilities.
Just a thought for consideration: it may be convenient to borrow some arguments from calcSubjectsFunction
(customized function for sample size re-calculation), but to provide for populations as well as subgroups. To be specific, we may need
Brannath, W., Zuber, E., Branson, M., Bretz, F., Gallo, P., Posch, M., and Racine-Poon, A. (2009), “Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology,” Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1445–1463. ↩
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4