lightr
imports UV-VIS reflectance/transmission/absorbance proprietary file formats in R. It also allows the import of related metadata that are critical to ensure reproducibility but that are often discarded by other tools.
Package: lightr
Title: Read Spectrometric Data in R
Version: 0.0.0.9000
Authors@R: c(
person("Hugo", "Gruson", role = c("cre", "aut"),
email = REDACTED,
comment = c(ORCID = "0000-0002-4094-1476")),
person("Rafael", "Maia", role = "aut",
email = "REDACTED",
comment = c(ORCID = "0000-0002-7563-9795")),
person("Thomas", "White", role = "aut",
email = "REDACTED",
comment = c(ORCID = "0000-0001-8493-9450"))
)
Description: Parse various UV-VIS reflectance/transmittance/absorbance spectra
file formats to extract spectral data and metadata.
Imports:
pbmcapply,
xml2
Suggests:
covr,
knitr,
rmarkdown,
spelling,
testthat
URL: https://bisaloo.github.io/lightr, https://github.com/Bisaloo/lightr
BugReports: https://github.com/Bisaloo/lightr/issues
License: GPL (>=2)
Encoding: UTF-8
LazyData: true
RoxygenNote: 6.1.1
Roxygen: list(markdown = TRUE)
Language: en-GB
VignetteBuilder: knitr
https://github.com/Bisaloo/lightr
Please indicate which category or categories from our package fit policies this package falls under and why? (e.g., data retrieval, reproducibility. If you are unsure, we suggest you make a pre-submission inquiry.):
Who is the target audience and what are scientific applications of this package?
People working with UV-VIS reflectance/transmittance/absorbance spectra, colour science (#colsci). People developing package to analyse spectral data with vision models (lightr
has few dependencies). Even non-R users who do not own the proprietary software to convert the proprietary formats to csv
files.
There is partial overlap with some other packages, as described in the README but to my knowledge, none of them have the same aims as lightr
.
Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:
paper.md
matching JOSS's requirements with a high-level description in the package root or in inst/
.Does R CMD check
(or devtools::check()
) succeed? Paste and describe any errors or warnings:
Does the package conform to rOpenSci packaging guidelines? Please describe any exceptions:
Some function names do not meet rOpenSci criteria (e.g. getspec()
and getmetadata()
) but this is kept for backwards compatibility with the package pavo
, from which lightr
originated. Synonyms have been added (get_spec()
and get_metadata()
) but it is at the moment unlikely that the old names will be deprecated.
If this is a resubmission following rejection, please explain the change in circumstances:
If possible, please provide recommendations of reviewers - those with experience with similar packages and/or likely users of your package - and their GitHub user names:
As mentioned in the template, some pieces still need polishing, mainly the vignettes but before going for one last push, I'd like to know if you would be interested.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4