The current XPath support requires the node's to provide a toString implementation in line with what we would like to call the name in XPath expressions.
We currently force nodes to define a toString by making it abstract on AbstractNode. The name is not appropriate, and it would be easy to generate a non-useful implementation by the IDE.
We should probably add a new, more-specific, String getXPathNodeName() method on AbstractNode, and use that instead.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4