[Trent]
I've added that as an option alternative to depending on a pinned version and using the "incubating" entry point. However, do you think we should reverse the suggestion and have the first suggestion be copying the definitions? (This could be done in a separate PR.)
[Jamie]
Thinking through this more... while it may not be a big deal for someone to pin now when only http is stable, it will become a bigger issue when the next wave of stable attributes come through (if there are changes). This would mean folks have the option to either pin and miss out on new stable attributes, or unpin and risk breaking changes. I'm leaning even more heavily now toward copying attributes, but am fine with that as a follow-up.
Originally posted by @JamieDanielson in #5166 (comment)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4