I'm thinking about getting or making a better scan.
It feels like the ebook copies I've seen come from an earlier draft than what made it into print, and that the print copy benefited from more proofreading. We've fixed mistakes that were present in ebooks, not artifacts of the ebook to markdown conversion, and not present in the print copy. A better scan could result in better OCR, and fixing a bunch of mistakes. (Though it might not! OCR is hard.)
For scanning:
For OCR, I have thoughts and notes, but it feels like a different discussion / issue, and I don't want to get too far ahead of myself.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4