The report method only returns the total coverage amount. However, sometimes we need this information in detail. For example, I need to know the function-by-function coverage of a file, and I can't do this using the report method. I know it's possible to do this using the html report method, but having the value inside a variable would make it much easier for a more detailed analysis of where the coverage is bad.
So if the report method returned a dictionary, for example, with the names of the functions and their coverage, it would be very useful.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4