A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://github.com/jmid/multicoretests/tree/macosx-segfault-repro below:

GitHub - ocaml-multicore/multicoretests at macosx-segfault-repro

Experimental property-based tests of (parts of) the OCaml multicore compiler.

This project contains

We are still experimenting with the interfaces, so consider yourself warned.

Installation instructions, and running the tests

The package multicorecheck can be installed independently from the testsuite with:

opam install ./multicorecheck.opam

it exposes the two libraries lin and stm. To use e.g. stm in a Dune project, you only need to add the following rule to your executable/library specification:

  (libraries multicorecheck.stm)

The test suite can be built and run with the following commands (from the root of this directory):

opam install . --deps-only --with-test
dune build
dune runtest -j1 --no-buffer --display=quiet

Individual tests can be run by invoking dune exec. For example:

$ dune exec src/atomic_test.exe -- -v
random seed: 51501376
generated error fail pass / total     time test name
[✓] 1000    0    0 1000 / 1000     0.2s sequential atomic test
[✓] 1000    0    0 1000 / 1000    21.7s parallel atomic test (w/repeat)
================================================================================
success (ran 2 tests)
A Parallel State-Machine Testing Library

STM contains a revision of qcstm extended to run parallel state-machine tests akin to Erlang QuickCheck, Haskell Hedgehog, ScalaCheck, ....

The module is phrased as a functor STM.Make expecting a programmatic description of a model, the tested commands, and how the model changes across commands. The resulting module contains a function agree_test: it tests whether the model agrees with the system-under-test (sut) across a sequential run of an arbitrary command sequence.

agree_test comes in a parallel variant agree_test_par which tests in parallel by spawning two domains with Domain (see lib/STM.ml).

Repeating a non-deterministic property can currently be done in two different ways:

A functor STM.AddGC inserts calls to Gc.minor() at random points between the executed commands.

We use two examples with known problems to help ensure that concurrency issues are indeed found as expected (aka. sanity check). For both of these a counter example is consistently found and shrunk:

Writing a model and specifying how the model changes across each command requires a bit of effort. The Lin module requires less from its users. It tests instead for linearizability, i.e., that the results observed during a parallel run is explainable by some linearized, sequentially interleaved run of the same commands.

The module is phrased as a functor Lin.Make expecting a programmatic description of the tested commands. The output module contains a function lin_test that performs the linearizability test. Currently lin_test supports two modes:

A recent combinator-based signature DSL in the style of Ctypes, ArtiCheck, and Monolith lowers the required user input to little more than a signature per tested command. See test/lin_api.ml for an example.

The modules can be used as part of the multicorecheck.lin library from the multicorecheck package.

Again we use examples with known problems to help ensure that concurrency issues are indeed found as expected:

contain "sanity check tests" for ref and CList over unboxed int and boxed int64 types.

Current (experimental) PBTs of multicore

Tests utilizing the parallel STM.ml capability:

Tests utilizing the linearizability tests of Lin.ml:

Tests of the underlying spawn/async functionality of Domain and Domainslib.Task (not using STM.ml or Lin.ml which rely on them):

Cornercase issue in domainslib

The tests found an issue in Domainslib.parallel_for_reduce which would yield the wrong result for empty arrays.

Specification of ws_deque

The initial tests of ws_deque just applied the parallelism property agree_prop_par. However that is not sufficient, as only the original domain (thread) is allowed to call push, pop, ..., while a spawned domain should call only steal.

A custom, revised property test in src/lockfree/ws_deque_test.ml runs a cmd prefix, then spawns a "stealer domain" with steal, ... calls, while the original domain performs calls across a broder random selection (push, pop, ...).

Here is an example output illustrating how size may return -1 when used in a "stealer domain". The first line in the Failure section lists the original domain's commands and the second lists the stealer domains commands (Steal,...). The second Messages section lists a rough dump of the corresponding return values: RSteal (Some 73) is the result of Steal, ... Here it is clear that the spawned domain successfully steals 73, and then observes both a -1 and 0 result from size depending on timing. Size should therefore not be considered threadsafe (none of the two papers make any such promises though):

$ dune exec src/ws_deque_test.exe
random seed: 55610855
generated error  fail  pass / total     time test name
[✗]   318     0     1   317 / 10000     2.4s parallel ws_deque test (w/repeat)

--- Failure --------------------------------------------------------------------

Test parallel ws_deque test (w/repeat) failed (8 shrink steps):

 Seq.prefix:  Parallel procs.:

          []  [(Push 73); Pop; Is_empty; Size]

              [Steal; Size; Size]


+++ Messages ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Messages for test parallel ws_deque test (w/repeat):

Result observations not explainable by linearized model:

  Seq.prefix:  Parallel procs.:

          []  [RPush; (RPop None); (RIs_empty true); (RSize 0)]

              [(RSteal (Some 73)); (RSize -1); (RSize 0)]

================================================================================
failure (1 tests failed, 0 tests errored, ran 1 tests)

Testing src/domainslib/task_one_dep.ml with 2 work pools found a segfault in domainslib.

A reported deadlock in domainslib motivated the development of these tests:

The tests in src/domainslib/task_one_dep.ml and src/domainslib/task_more_deps.ml are run with a timeout to prevent deadlocking indefinitely.

src/domainslib/task_one_dep.ml can trigger one such deadlock.

It exhibits no non-determistic behaviour when repeating the same tested property from within the QCheck test. However it fails (due to timeout) on the following test input:

$ dune exec -- src/task_one_dep.exe -v
random seed: 147821373
generated error fail pass / total     time test name
[✗]   25    0    1   24 /  100    36.2s Task.async/await

--- Failure --------------------------------------------------------------------

Test Task.async/await failed (2 shrink steps):

{ num_domains = 3; length = 6;
  dependencies = [|None; (Some 0); None; (Some 1); None; None|] }
================================================================================
failure (1 tests failed, 0 tests errored, ran 1 tests)

This corresponds to the program (available in issues/task_issue.ml) with 3+1 domains and 6 promises. It loops infinitely with both bytecode/native:

...
open Domainslib

(* a simple work item, from ocaml/testsuite/tests/misc/takc.ml *)
let rec tak x y z =
  if x > y then tak (tak (x-1) y z) (tak (y-1) z x) (tak (z-1) x y)
           else z

let work () =
  for _ = 1 to 200 do
    assert (7 = tak 18 12 6);
  done

let pool = Task.setup_pool ~num_additional_domains:3 ()

let p0 = Task.async pool work
let p1 = Task.async pool (fun () -> work (); Task.await pool p0)
let p2 = Task.async pool work
let p3 = Task.async pool (fun () -> work (); Task.await pool p1)
let p4 = Task.async pool work
let p5 = Task.async pool work

let () = List.iter (fun p -> Task.await pool p) [p0;p1;p2;p3;p4;p5]
let () = Task.teardown_pool pool

Utop segfaults when loading src/domain/domain_spawntree.ml interactively:

$ utop
──────────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────
                                              │ Welcome to utop version 2.8.0 (using OCaml version 4.12.0+domains)! │                                              
                                              └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘                                              
Findlib has been successfully loaded. Additional directives:
  #require "package";;      to load a package
  #list;;                   to list the available packages
  #camlp4o;;                to load camlp4 (standard syntax)
  #camlp4r;;                to load camlp4 (revised syntax)
  #predicates "p,q,...";;   to set these predicates
  Topfind.reset();;         to force that packages will be reloaded
  #thread;;                 to enable threads


Type #utop_help for help about using utop.

utop # #require "ppx_deriving.show";;
utop # #require "qcheck";;
utop # #use "src/domain_spawntree.ml";;
type cmd = Incr | Decr | Spawn of cmd list
val pp_cmd : Format.formatter -> cmd -> unit = <fun>
val show_cmd : cmd -> string = <fun>
val count_spawns : cmd -> int = <fun>
val gen : int -> int -> cmd Gen.t = <fun>
val shrink_cmd : cmd Shrink.t = <fun>
val interp : int -> cmd -> int = <fun>
val dom_interp : int Atomic.t -> cmd -> unit = <fun>
val t : max_depth:int -> max_width:int -> Test.t = <fun>
random seed: 359528592
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

This does not happen when running a plain ocaml top-level though, so it seems utop-specific.


RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4