N4480 8.2.1.2[memory.smartptr.shared.obs]p6 reads
Remarks: When
Tis an array type or cv-qualifiedvoid, it is unspecified whether this member function is declared. If it is declared, it is unspecified what its return type is, except that the declaration (although not necessarily the definition) of the function shall be well formed.
The phrase "cv-qualified void" seems to imply that if T is cv-unqualified (plain) void, then this remark doesn't apply. I wonder whether this is the intent.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4