LWG closed issue 3033 as "NAD editorial", with a suggestion that changing the caption on the table would be both editorial and sufficient.
The current caption is "basic_string(const basic_string&) effects"
My first suggestion is: "basic_string(const basic_string&) and basic_string(const basic_string&&) effects", but I'm not going to insist on that.
The discussion occurred on the -lib reflector in the thread titled "Issue 3033: basic_string move ctor is underspecified"
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4