Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://github.com/cnescatlab/i-CodeCNES/issues/158 below:

Inconsistency between "RNC shell SH.FLOW.CheckUser example" and "I-code COMDESIGNActiveWait LEX" · Issue #158 · cnescatlab/i-CodeCNES · GitHub

The correct example for RNC shell rule SH.FLOW.CheckUser allows the usage of read command:
if [ "${current_user}" == "root" ]; then
echo "! Execution avec les droits de $current_user !"
echo -n "! Voulez-vous continuer (Oui,Non) ?"
read reponse
if [ "${reponse}" == "N" ] || [ "${reponse}" == "Non" ] || [
"${reponse}" == "n" ] || [ "${reponse}" == "non" ]; then
echo "Sortie du script ..."
exit
fi
fi

So if we copy this example in our shell script, we expect no error.

In i-code LEX of COMDESIGNActiveWait rule "read" is considered as active wait command:
ACTWAIT = "read" | "sleep" | "wait"

So if we copy the RNC correct example of rule SH.FLOW.CheckUser (above) we have an COMDESIGNActiveWait error

Use the example of RNC shell rule SH.FLOW.CheckUser (above) in a script

V3.0.1

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4