Hi,
at the bottom of the README.org file you mention the following:
Feel free to open a pull request. Please don’t add your personal config file. I won’t accept it unless it is vetted by other community members.
and I've seen you say something along these lines many times in the pull requests. Yet it seems a bit arbitrary to me (and to others). Certain personal configurations do get accepted, like #28, while others just get rejected without any understandable explanation (#1, #2, #5, #7, ...). Just referring to the quote above, just let's people hope that they might get accepted.
Wouldn't it be better to set up some criteria, or minimum requirements to get added to the list? Or maybe one must highlight something original and/or noteworthy to get accepted, be it their configuration or not. I believe that this would not only increase the quality of the list, but also make it easier to maintain, since people would know when it makes sense to suggest their configuration. Maybe one could even go beyond the table-format and create a properly structured org file with code snippets, images and what-not.
I hope there can be a conversation about this :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4