Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://github.com/brancz/kube-rbac-proxy/issues/356 below:

(41) Is a massive mutation of the `authorizer.Attributes` intended? Why? · Issue #356 · brancz/kube-rbac-proxy · GitHub

Why do we, by default, only care about those Resource Attributes:

• User
• Verb
• Path

And ignore:

• Namespace
• APIGroup
• APIVersion
• Resource
• SubResource
• Name

Most probably, we assume that there must be a specific authorization to the path we are protecting with kube-rbac-proxy. Speak, is the: User allowed to Verb at Path.

But worth to investigate the behavior of the SAR request created in such a situation, if not trimmed and compare the results.

• link

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4