Right now a record
record R : Set where
field
x : Nat
has a constructor which is internally named R.constructor but the user can't refer to this directly. (They can still get their hands on this name using reflection, since a record-type definition includes the constructor name). This makes it a bit annoying to construct records using reflection, since you can't quote R.constructor, and it also blocks the use of a few features e.g. #6660 or the upcoming #6721, since you can't refer to this name in pragmas either.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4