See e.g. this CI run: https://github.com/agda/agda/actions/runs/6577500740/job/17869278492
Compare this with pre #6863 run https://github.com/agda/agda/actions/runs/6510947029/job/17685706260
Post #6863 run https://github.com/agda/agda/actions/runs/6534521998/job/17741904793
So this is likely a regression introduced by
This PR changed the default flags for building Agda (adding -f debug
to preserve debug printing facility) which have not been likewise changed in
ATTN:
@AndrasKovacsThe question is whether we need the size-solver-test
at all in CI.
In #6932 I added commit be28b6e to switch it off (hot fix to recover CI times).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4